File #2288: "2018_Book_EnforcementAndEffectivenessOfT.pdf"
Testo
1|Préface/Preface|6
1|Contents|11
1|Part I / Partie I: Keynote Speeches / Leçons Inaugurale et de Clôture|13
2|The Multiple Facets of Law Enforcement|14
3|1 Introduction|14
4|1.1 Substantive Law and Enforcement|14
4|1.2 Characteristic Features of Enforcement Mechanisms|16
3|2 Law Enforcement by Varying State Measures|17
4|2.1 Survey|17
4|2.2 The Case of Competition Law: Private, Public and Criminal Enforcement|18
5|2.2.1 From Private to Public Enforcement|18
5|2.2.2 From Public to Private Enforcement|19
5|2.2.3 Criminal Enforcement|20
4|2.3 The Case of Consumer Protection: Individual, Collective and Administrative Action|21
5|2.3.1 Limits of Traditional Enforcement Through Civil Courts|21
5|2.3.2 Collective Actions|22
5|2.3.3 Public Enforcement by State Authorities|25
4|2.4 Conclusion on State Measures|27
3|3 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)|28
4|3.1 Survey|28
4|3.2 Arbitration|29
4|3.3 Ombudsman Complaint Procedures|30
5|3.3.1 Law Enforcement in Consumer Disputes|30
5|3.3.2 ADR in the US and the EU|31
4|3.4 Mediation and Conciliation|33
3|4 Extra-Legal, Societal Enforcement Mechanisms|35
4|4.1 The Advancement of Soft Law|35
4|4.2 Enforcement and Compliance|36
5|4.2.1 Support by State Law|36
5|4.2.2 Societal Enforcement Mechanisms|38
3|5 Conclusion|39
3|References|40
2|Enforcing Legal Norms Through Private Means|44
3|1 Introduction|44
3|2 Purely Personal Enforcement of Non-Binding Norms|45
3|3 Law Enforcement Through Institutional or Organizational Structures|46
3|4 Collective Private Law Creation and Enforcement|47
3|5 Privately Developed Practices as Actual Private Law Norms|49
3|6 Private Parties as Law Enforcement Actors|50
3|7 Conclusion|51
3|References|52
1|Part II / Partie II: Round-Table Interventions / Interventions à l´Occasion des Tables-Rondes|53
2|A Global Adaptive System for Supporting Human Rights?|54
3|1 Introduction|54
3|2 What Is an ``Adaptive System´´?|55
3|3 The Global Adaptive System of Human Rights|56
4|3.1 The Field|56
4|3.2 Agents and Interactions|57
5|3.2.1 States|57
5|3.2.2 Transnational Organizations|58
5|3.2.3 Nongovernment Organizations (NGOs)|59
5|3.2.4 Scholars and Journalists|59
3|4 Some Consequences for Human Rights|60
4|4.1 Increased Awareness|60
4|4.2 Improved Access, Dialogue, and the Potential for Cooperation|60
4|4.3 Changed Incentives|61
4|4.4 Content and Framing of Human Rights Norms|61
3|5 Potential Roles for Comparative Law Tools|62
4|5.1 Patterning and Mapping|62
4|5.2 Function and Context|63
4|5.3 Voices/Formants|63
4|5.4 Decisional Analysis|63
3|6 Conclusions|64
3|References|64
2|Jurisdictional Conflicts in Criminal Matters and Their Settlement Within EU´s Supranational Settings|66
3|1 A Fundamental Starting Point|66
3|2 Interests Behind Jurisdictional Conflicts in Criminal Matters and Their Resolution|67
3|3 Settlement Models for Conflicts of Jurisdictions in Criminal Matters at the National Level|69
3|4 Settlement Models for Conflicts of Jurisdiction in Criminal Matters at the International Level|70
3|5 Resolving and Preventing Conflicts of Jurisdiction in Criminal Matters at a Supranational Level: The EU Approach: A Baffling...|72
3|6 Reflections on a Future Model for Preventing and Resolving Jurisdictional Conflicts in the EU|76
3|7 Conclusion|80
3|References|81
2|Diversité, pertinence et efficacité des mécanismes internationaux de règlement des différends en matière économique|83
3|1 Introduction|83
3|2 L´état des lieux|84
3|3 La pertinence du choix à travers l´efficacité|87
4|3.1 La médiation|88
4|3.2 L´arbitrage|90
4|3.3 Les juridictions étatiques|91
4|3.4 Changer de processus|93
3|References|93
2|Effectiveness of International Commercial Arbitration as a Dispute Settlement Mechanism|94
3|1 Introduction|94
3|2 A Little Bit of History|95
3|3 National Courts or Commercial Arbitration?|97
3|4 The Perils of a ``Technocratization´´ of the Arbitral Process|98
3|5 The ``Grand-old Men´´ vs. the ``Technocrats´´|101
3|6 The Dangers of ``Technocratization´´|102
3|7 The Legitimate Expectation of the Parties|104
3|8 A ``Broader Brush´´|106
3|9 The Corrective Formula in Arbitration|107
3|10 In Conclusion|110
3|References|110
1|Part III / Partie III: Workshops / Ateliers|114
2|Challenges for the Enforcement and Effectiveness of Criminal Law: The Prohibition on Illegal Drugs|115
3|1 Introduction|115
3|2 Enforcement, Effectiveness and Efficiency of Criminal Law|117
3|3 A Case Study: Effectiveness of U.S. Drug Law Enforcement|121
4|3.1 Substantive Drug Laws: From Regulatory to Criminal Law|121
4|3.2 State and Federal Enforcement|123
4|3.3 From Drug Courts to Legalization|126
3|4 Major Challenges for the Enforcement of Criminal Law Through the Criminal Procedure in the Field of Drug Related Crimes|128
4|4.1 Enforcement of Criminal Law, Drug-Trafficking and Organized Crime|128
4|4.2 The Need for a Pro-Active Approach|130
4|4.3 Enhancing International Cooperation|132
4|4.4 Special Investigation Techniques and Collaborators of Justice|136
3|5 Concluding Remarks|138
3|References|138
2|Enforcement of Contractual Obligations: Comparative Perspectives|141
3|1 Introduction|141
3|2 Duty to Negotiate a Contract in Good Faith and Monetary Relief|143
3|3 Relief for Breach of Contract: Specific Performance vs. Damages|146
3|4 Enforcement of the Parties´ Agreement to Pay a Specific Sum of Money in Case of Non-Performance or Delay in Performance|148
3|5 Post-Judgment Mechanisms Aimed at Ensuring the Full and Speedy Enforcement of Contractual Promises|151
2|Intra-Family Torts: From Immunity to Special Rules in Criminal and Civil Law|155
1|Contents|11
1|Part I / Partie I: Keynote Speeches / Leçons Inaugurale et de Clôture|13
2|The Multiple Facets of Law Enforcement|14
3|1 Introduction|14
4|1.1 Substantive Law and Enforcement|14
4|1.2 Characteristic Features of Enforcement Mechanisms|16
3|2 Law Enforcement by Varying State Measures|17
4|2.1 Survey|17
4|2.2 The Case of Competition Law: Private, Public and Criminal Enforcement|18
5|2.2.1 From Private to Public Enforcement|18
5|2.2.2 From Public to Private Enforcement|19
5|2.2.3 Criminal Enforcement|20
4|2.3 The Case of Consumer Protection: Individual, Collective and Administrative Action|21
5|2.3.1 Limits of Traditional Enforcement Through Civil Courts|21
5|2.3.2 Collective Actions|22
5|2.3.3 Public Enforcement by State Authorities|25
4|2.4 Conclusion on State Measures|27
3|3 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)|28
4|3.1 Survey|28
4|3.2 Arbitration|29
4|3.3 Ombudsman Complaint Procedures|30
5|3.3.1 Law Enforcement in Consumer Disputes|30
5|3.3.2 ADR in the US and the EU|31
4|3.4 Mediation and Conciliation|33
3|4 Extra-Legal, Societal Enforcement Mechanisms|35
4|4.1 The Advancement of Soft Law|35
4|4.2 Enforcement and Compliance|36
5|4.2.1 Support by State Law|36
5|4.2.2 Societal Enforcement Mechanisms|38
3|5 Conclusion|39
3|References|40
2|Enforcing Legal Norms Through Private Means|44
3|1 Introduction|44
3|2 Purely Personal Enforcement of Non-Binding Norms|45
3|3 Law Enforcement Through Institutional or Organizational Structures|46
3|4 Collective Private Law Creation and Enforcement|47
3|5 Privately Developed Practices as Actual Private Law Norms|49
3|6 Private Parties as Law Enforcement Actors|50
3|7 Conclusion|51
3|References|52
1|Part II / Partie II: Round-Table Interventions / Interventions à l´Occasion des Tables-Rondes|53
2|A Global Adaptive System for Supporting Human Rights?|54
3|1 Introduction|54
3|2 What Is an ``Adaptive System´´?|55
3|3 The Global Adaptive System of Human Rights|56
4|3.1 The Field|56
4|3.2 Agents and Interactions|57
5|3.2.1 States|57
5|3.2.2 Transnational Organizations|58
5|3.2.3 Nongovernment Organizations (NGOs)|59
5|3.2.4 Scholars and Journalists|59
3|4 Some Consequences for Human Rights|60
4|4.1 Increased Awareness|60
4|4.2 Improved Access, Dialogue, and the Potential for Cooperation|60
4|4.3 Changed Incentives|61
4|4.4 Content and Framing of Human Rights Norms|61
3|5 Potential Roles for Comparative Law Tools|62
4|5.1 Patterning and Mapping|62
4|5.2 Function and Context|63
4|5.3 Voices/Formants|63
4|5.4 Decisional Analysis|63
3|6 Conclusions|64
3|References|64
2|Jurisdictional Conflicts in Criminal Matters and Their Settlement Within EU´s Supranational Settings|66
3|1 A Fundamental Starting Point|66
3|2 Interests Behind Jurisdictional Conflicts in Criminal Matters and Their Resolution|67
3|3 Settlement Models for Conflicts of Jurisdictions in Criminal Matters at the National Level|69
3|4 Settlement Models for Conflicts of Jurisdiction in Criminal Matters at the International Level|70
3|5 Resolving and Preventing Conflicts of Jurisdiction in Criminal Matters at a Supranational Level: The EU Approach: A Baffling...|72
3|6 Reflections on a Future Model for Preventing and Resolving Jurisdictional Conflicts in the EU|76
3|7 Conclusion|80
3|References|81
2|Diversité, pertinence et efficacité des mécanismes internationaux de règlement des différends en matière économique|83
3|1 Introduction|83
3|2 L´état des lieux|84
3|3 La pertinence du choix à travers l´efficacité|87
4|3.1 La médiation|88
4|3.2 L´arbitrage|90
4|3.3 Les juridictions étatiques|91
4|3.4 Changer de processus|93
3|References|93
2|Effectiveness of International Commercial Arbitration as a Dispute Settlement Mechanism|94
3|1 Introduction|94
3|2 A Little Bit of History|95
3|3 National Courts or Commercial Arbitration?|97
3|4 The Perils of a ``Technocratization´´ of the Arbitral Process|98
3|5 The ``Grand-old Men´´ vs. the ``Technocrats´´|101
3|6 The Dangers of ``Technocratization´´|102
3|7 The Legitimate Expectation of the Parties|104
3|8 A ``Broader Brush´´|106
3|9 The Corrective Formula in Arbitration|107
3|10 In Conclusion|110
3|References|110
1|Part III / Partie III: Workshops / Ateliers|114
2|Challenges for the Enforcement and Effectiveness of Criminal Law: The Prohibition on Illegal Drugs|115
3|1 Introduction|115
3|2 Enforcement, Effectiveness and Efficiency of Criminal Law|117
3|3 A Case Study: Effectiveness of U.S. Drug Law Enforcement|121
4|3.1 Substantive Drug Laws: From Regulatory to Criminal Law|121
4|3.2 State and Federal Enforcement|123
4|3.3 From Drug Courts to Legalization|126
3|4 Major Challenges for the Enforcement of Criminal Law Through the Criminal Procedure in the Field of Drug Related Crimes|128
4|4.1 Enforcement of Criminal Law, Drug-Trafficking and Organized Crime|128
4|4.2 The Need for a Pro-Active Approach|130
4|4.3 Enhancing International Cooperation|132
4|4.4 Special Investigation Techniques and Collaborators of Justice|136
3|5 Concluding Remarks|138
3|References|138
2|Enforcement of Contractual Obligations: Comparative Perspectives|141
3|1 Introduction|141
3|2 Duty to Negotiate a Contract in Good Faith and Monetary Relief|143
3|3 Relief for Breach of Contract: Specific Performance vs. Damages|146
3|4 Enforcement of the Parties´ Agreement to Pay a Specific Sum of Money in Case of Non-Performance or Delay in Performance|148
3|5 Post-Judgment Mechanisms Aimed at Ensuring the Full and Speedy Enforcement of Contractual Promises|151
2|Intra-Family Torts: From Immunity to Special Rules in Criminal and Civil Law|155