File #2413: "2018_Book_PublicConfidenceInCriminalJust.pdf"
Testo
1|Preface|7
2|References|8
1|Acknowledgements|9
1|Contents|11
1|List of Tables|13
1|Chapter 1: Public Confidence in Criminal Justice: What’s the Problem?|14
2|References|19
1|Chapter 2: Constructing Public Confidence: A Chronology of the Research Agenda|21
2|2.1 1970s: Two Perspectives on Public Opinion about Crime and Justice|23
2|2.2 1980s: ‘False Shadows’ and ‘True Substances’|25
2|2.3 1990s: Real, Measurable, and Caused|26
2|2.4 2000s: Consolidation of an Agenda|30
2|2.5 Conclusion|35
2|References|38
1|Chapter 3: Deconstructing Public Confidence: The Public Confidence Agenda as a Governmental Project|41
2|3.1 Identifying Objects in the ‘Grid of Specification’|42
2|3.2 Violating the ‘Things to Be Known’|46
2|3.3 ‘Reality Effects’|49
2|3.4 The Real and the Unreal: Relocating the Problem|52
2|3.5 Undermining Alternative Approaches: Dismissing Deliberation|54
2|3.6 Conclusion|56
2|References|58
1|Chapter 4: Archaeology: Surfaces of Emergence for the Public Confidence Agenda|61
2|4.1 Note on Method: Excavating the History of the Present|63
2|4.2 The Removal of Justice from Public View|64
2|4.3 The Move Towards an Emphasis on Instrumental Goals in Penality|67
2|4.4 Homo criminalis and ‘The Science of the State’: The Coming of Criminology|72
2|4.5 ‘Justice Tempered by Understanding’: Modern Criminology in Britain|75
2|4.6 Bringing the Public Back in: From Full Adult Suffrage to Managerialist Accountability via the (Re)invention of ‘Public Opinion’|77
2|4.7 Conclusion|83
2|References|86
1|Chapter 5: Genealogy: How the Public Confidence Agenda Got Its ‘Hooks’ into Criminal Justice|89
2|5.1 Note on Method: Tracing the Movement of a Concept Through Texts|91
2|5.2 A Few ‘Black Sheep’: Police Misconduct and Public Confidence in Policing|91
2|5.3 ‘Vital to Maintain Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice System’: Playing the Confidence Card|94
2|5.4 ‘This Sorry Chapter in the History of English Justice’: The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice and Lord Taylor’s Pledge|97
2|5.5 Criminal Justice Politics Get ‘Tough’|100
2|5.6 ‘A Child’s Screams Must Not Be Stifled’: Minimum Tariffs for Murder|106
2|5.7 Looking Back in Anger? Political and Media Discourse Meets Criminological Concern about ‘Penal Populism’|108
2|5.8 Conclusion|110
2|References|111
1|Chapter 6: Conclusion: Researchers and the Making of Political Worlds|114
2|6.1 Recap of the Argument so Far|115
2|6.2 ‘Costs to Existence’|117
2|6.3 Towards a ‘Better Politics’|118
2|References|121
1|Appendix 1: A More Detailed Description and Critique of Some Studies of Public Confidence Completed in the Early 2000s|122
2|Locally Commissioned Studies|122
2|MORI|123
2|NOP World/Phillip Gould Associates|124
2|Controlled Experiments|124
2|References|128
1|Appendix 2: Approaching the Genealogical Analysis of Public Confidence|129
2|References|132
1|Bibliography|133
1|Index|142
2|References|8
1|Acknowledgements|9
1|Contents|11
1|List of Tables|13
1|Chapter 1: Public Confidence in Criminal Justice: What’s the Problem?|14
2|References|19
1|Chapter 2: Constructing Public Confidence: A Chronology of the Research Agenda|21
2|2.1 1970s: Two Perspectives on Public Opinion about Crime and Justice|23
2|2.2 1980s: ‘False Shadows’ and ‘True Substances’|25
2|2.3 1990s: Real, Measurable, and Caused|26
2|2.4 2000s: Consolidation of an Agenda|30
2|2.5 Conclusion|35
2|References|38
1|Chapter 3: Deconstructing Public Confidence: The Public Confidence Agenda as a Governmental Project|41
2|3.1 Identifying Objects in the ‘Grid of Specification’|42
2|3.2 Violating the ‘Things to Be Known’|46
2|3.3 ‘Reality Effects’|49
2|3.4 The Real and the Unreal: Relocating the Problem|52
2|3.5 Undermining Alternative Approaches: Dismissing Deliberation|54
2|3.6 Conclusion|56
2|References|58
1|Chapter 4: Archaeology: Surfaces of Emergence for the Public Confidence Agenda|61
2|4.1 Note on Method: Excavating the History of the Present|63
2|4.2 The Removal of Justice from Public View|64
2|4.3 The Move Towards an Emphasis on Instrumental Goals in Penality|67
2|4.4 Homo criminalis and ‘The Science of the State’: The Coming of Criminology|72
2|4.5 ‘Justice Tempered by Understanding’: Modern Criminology in Britain|75
2|4.6 Bringing the Public Back in: From Full Adult Suffrage to Managerialist Accountability via the (Re)invention of ‘Public Opinion’|77
2|4.7 Conclusion|83
2|References|86
1|Chapter 5: Genealogy: How the Public Confidence Agenda Got Its ‘Hooks’ into Criminal Justice|89
2|5.1 Note on Method: Tracing the Movement of a Concept Through Texts|91
2|5.2 A Few ‘Black Sheep’: Police Misconduct and Public Confidence in Policing|91
2|5.3 ‘Vital to Maintain Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice System’: Playing the Confidence Card|94
2|5.4 ‘This Sorry Chapter in the History of English Justice’: The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice and Lord Taylor’s Pledge|97
2|5.5 Criminal Justice Politics Get ‘Tough’|100
2|5.6 ‘A Child’s Screams Must Not Be Stifled’: Minimum Tariffs for Murder|106
2|5.7 Looking Back in Anger? Political and Media Discourse Meets Criminological Concern about ‘Penal Populism’|108
2|5.8 Conclusion|110
2|References|111
1|Chapter 6: Conclusion: Researchers and the Making of Political Worlds|114
2|6.1 Recap of the Argument so Far|115
2|6.2 ‘Costs to Existence’|117
2|6.3 Towards a ‘Better Politics’|118
2|References|121
1|Appendix 1: A More Detailed Description and Critique of Some Studies of Public Confidence Completed in the Early 2000s|122
2|Locally Commissioned Studies|122
2|MORI|123
2|NOP World/Phillip Gould Associates|124
2|Controlled Experiments|124
2|References|128
1|Appendix 2: Approaching the Genealogical Analysis of Public Confidence|129
2|References|132
1|Bibliography|133
1|Index|142