File #2494: "2018_Book_DoubleEnumerationOfLegislative.pdf"
Testo
1|Preface|6
1|Contents|7
1|List of Cases and Opinions|9
2|Canada|9
2|Denmark|10
2|Finland|11
2|Court of Justice of the European Union|13
2|European Court of Human Rights|13
2|United Nations Human Rights Committee|13
1|1 Introduction|14
2|References|17
1|2 Construction of Two Enumerations|18
2|2.1 Constitutional Basis|18
2|2.2 Legislative History Behind Two Lists of Enumerations|20
2|References|29
1|3 Material Content of Enumerations|30
2|3.1 Canada and the Provinces: A Mix of Law-Making Powers for Both Orders of Government|30
2|3.2 Finland and the Åland Islands: Competence Mainly in Public Law|35
2|3.3 Denmark and the Faroe Islands: Sub-state Entity in Charge of Its Own Competence|39
2|3.4 Limited or No Existence of Concurrent Powers|47
2|3.5 Lack of Federal or National Supremacy|49
2|References|54
1|4 Management of Competence Claims|55
2|4.1 Bodies of Dispute Resolution|55
3|4.1.1 Canada: Symmetrical but Unsystematic Competence Control|55
3|4.1.2 Finland: Asymmetrical but Systematic Competence Control|56
3|4.1.3 Denmark: Unilateral but Inactive Competence Control|64
3|4.1.4 Concluding Remarks|69
2|4.2 Methods of Managing the Distribution of Competence|70
3|4.2.1 Canada and the Provinces: Interpretations to Enhance Cooperative Federalism|70
3|4.2.2 Finland and the Åland Islands: Watertight Compartments with Some Modifications|81
3|4.2.3 Denmark and the Faroe Islands: Political Determination Leading to Uncertainty over Competence|88
3|4.2.4 Concluding Remarks|89
2|References|90
1|5 Resolution of Competence Claims Concerning Legislative Matters not Mentioned in Enumerations|92
2|References|103
1|6 Excursus: The European Union|105
2|References|112
1|7 Concluding Remarks|113
1|Contents|7
1|List of Cases and Opinions|9
2|Canada|9
2|Denmark|10
2|Finland|11
2|Court of Justice of the European Union|13
2|European Court of Human Rights|13
2|United Nations Human Rights Committee|13
1|1 Introduction|14
2|References|17
1|2 Construction of Two Enumerations|18
2|2.1 Constitutional Basis|18
2|2.2 Legislative History Behind Two Lists of Enumerations|20
2|References|29
1|3 Material Content of Enumerations|30
2|3.1 Canada and the Provinces: A Mix of Law-Making Powers for Both Orders of Government|30
2|3.2 Finland and the Åland Islands: Competence Mainly in Public Law|35
2|3.3 Denmark and the Faroe Islands: Sub-state Entity in Charge of Its Own Competence|39
2|3.4 Limited or No Existence of Concurrent Powers|47
2|3.5 Lack of Federal or National Supremacy|49
2|References|54
1|4 Management of Competence Claims|55
2|4.1 Bodies of Dispute Resolution|55
3|4.1.1 Canada: Symmetrical but Unsystematic Competence Control|55
3|4.1.2 Finland: Asymmetrical but Systematic Competence Control|56
3|4.1.3 Denmark: Unilateral but Inactive Competence Control|64
3|4.1.4 Concluding Remarks|69
2|4.2 Methods of Managing the Distribution of Competence|70
3|4.2.1 Canada and the Provinces: Interpretations to Enhance Cooperative Federalism|70
3|4.2.2 Finland and the Åland Islands: Watertight Compartments with Some Modifications|81
3|4.2.3 Denmark and the Faroe Islands: Political Determination Leading to Uncertainty over Competence|88
3|4.2.4 Concluding Remarks|89
2|References|90
1|5 Resolution of Competence Claims Concerning Legislative Matters not Mentioned in Enumerations|92
2|References|103
1|6 Excursus: The European Union|105
2|References|112
1|7 Concluding Remarks|113