File #2529: "2018_Book_EthiopianYearbookOfInternation.pdf"
Text
1|Contents|6
1|Part I: Introduction|8
2|Towards Resolving Our Development, Integration and Security Challenges Through International Law|9
3|Reference|15
1|Part II: Articles|16
2|The Law and Policy of Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection in Ethiopia: An Appraisal of Theories, Practices and Challenges|17
3|1 Introduction|17
3|2 Conceptual Underpinnings|20
3|3 Ethiopian FDI Law and Regulation|23
4|3.1 Entry, Establishment and Operation of Foreign Investment|24
4|3.2 Treatment and Protection of Investors|26
5|3.2.1 Standards of Treatment of Investment and Investors|27
5|3.2.2 Protection of Investment from Expropriation|28
3|4 Legal and Institutional Reforms and Assertive Interventions|32
4|4.1 Context: Ambitious Policy|32
4|4.2 Legal and Institutional Reforms|33
4|4.3 Assertive Intervention: The Case of Building Industrial Parks|34
3|5 Some Challenges and State Responses|35
4|5.1 Land Management Practices, Issues and Responses|36
4|5.2 Some Interpretative, Technical and Procedural Issues|40
3|6 Conclusions|44
3|References|47
2|Comparative Perspective on Exhaustible Resource Development in Ethiopia: Lessons from the Norwegian Legal Framework and Experience|52
3|1 Introduction|52
3|2 Overview of Ethiopian Petroleum Resources and Law|56
4|2.1 Petroleum Resources and Their Place in the Ethiopian Economy|56
4|2.2 Petroleum Resource Extraction Framework|58
3|3 The Concepts of Sustainable Development and Optimising Extraction|60
4|3.1 Sustainable Development|60
4|3.2 Optimising Petroleum Extraction for Sustainable Development|61
3|4 Law and the Optimisation of Petroleum Extraction|62
3|5 Ethiopian Law and Optimal Extraction of Petroleum: A Comparative Analysis|63
4|5.1 An Introduction to the Structures of the Legal Framework|63
4|5.2 The Structure of the Ethiopian Legal Framework and Sustainable Development: A Norwegian Perspective|65
4|5.3 Imbuing Policy in the Law|75
3|6 Conclusion|77
3|References|78
4|Books, Articles and Web Sites|78
4|Legal Instruments|80
4|Australia|80
4|Ethiopia|81
4|Norway|81
4|United Nations|81
2|The GERD and the Revival of the Egyptian–Sudanese Dispute over the Nile Waters|82
3|1 Introduction|82
3|2 Genesis of the Egyptian–Sudanese Dispute over the Nile Waters: The Gezira Scheme|84
3|3 The 1959 Nile Waters Agreement: An Alliance Under Hydrohegemony?|88
3|4 Sudan’s Embarrassment and Dilemma over Its Unused Share of the Nile Waters|92
3|5 The Nile Basin Cooperative Framework Agreement, Water Security, and Current Uses and Rights|94
3|6 The GERD, the Report of the Panel of Experts, and the Two Recommended Studies|96
3|7 The Agreement on Declaration of Principles on the GERD and the Two Studies|99
3|8 The Saga of the Two Studies Continues: The Khartoum Document|101
3|9 Current Uses and Current Rights and the Baseline Data for the Two Studies|103
3|10 Conclusion|107
3|References|111
2|The Challenge of Overlapping Regional Economic Communities in Africa: Lessons for the Continental Free Trade Area from the Failures of the Tripartite Free Trade Area|114
3|1 Introduction|115
3|2 The African Regional Integration Agenda in Brief|116
4|2.1 The Abuja Treaty|118
3|3 The Challenge of Multiple Membership in RECs and Successive Attempts to Address It|121
4|3.1 The Three RECs: COMESA, EAC, and SADC|123
4|3.2 The AEC and the RECs: From a Moratorium on Recognition to Further Rationalization|127
4|3.3 From Rationalization to Merger|129
3|4 The Tripartite Initiative and Its Unfulfilled Promise|131
4|4.1 What Went Wrong with the TFTA Vision?|134
4|4.2 What Can the CFTA Learn from the TFTA Experience?|139
3|5 Concluding Remarks and Lessons for the CFTA Negotiators|140
3|References|142
2|Like Fish in a Stream? Considering the Agency of the UN Peacekeepers of the Global South: Rwanda and India as Case Studies|145
3|1 Introduction|145
3|2 Theoretical Framework|148
3|3 Case Study of India and Rwanda|150
3|4 Analysis|161
3|5 Conclusion|166
3|References|167
1|Part III: Current Development|172
2|The Kenya/Somalia Maritime Boundary Delimitation Dispute|173
3|1 Introduction|173
3|2 The Dispute|174
3|3 Kenya’s Preliminary Objections|176
3|4 Prospects of the Case|179
3|5 The Dispute and Maritime Delimitation Practice in Africa|182
3|6 Conclusion|183
3|References|184
2|The ICC and Africa: Should the Latter Remain Engaged?|186
3|1 Introduction|186
3|2 Prosecutorial Policy and the Perils of Selective Justice|189
3|3 The Threats of Withdrawals: From a Negative to a Positive Impact?|191
3|4 Africa’s Contribution to the Development of International Criminal Law|195
3|5 Tailoring an Alternative/or a Parallel Criminal Justice in Africa?|198
3|6 Conclusion|200
3|References|201
1|Part IV: Case Report|203
2|Case Note on PetroTrans Company Ltd. v. Ministry of Mines of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia|204
3|1 Introduction|204
3|2 Background to the Dispute|205
3|3 The Arbitration|206
3|4 The Arbitral Jurisprudence of Petroleum in Ethiopia|207
3|5 Conclusion|209
3|References|209
1|Part V: Book Review|210
2|Zeray Yihdego, Alistair Rieu-Clarke and Ana Elisa Cascão (eds.): The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and the Nile Basin—Implications for Transboundary Water Cooperation|211
2|Won L. Kidane: The Culture of International Arbitration|217
3|Reference|221
1|Part VI: UN Document with Commentary|222
2|UN Security Council Resolution 2378 (2017) and the Progressive Peacekeeping Agenda: A Commentary|223
3|Resolution 2378 (2017) on Peacekeeping Reform|226
3|References|231
1|Part I: Introduction|8
2|Towards Resolving Our Development, Integration and Security Challenges Through International Law|9
3|Reference|15
1|Part II: Articles|16
2|The Law and Policy of Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection in Ethiopia: An Appraisal of Theories, Practices and Challenges|17
3|1 Introduction|17
3|2 Conceptual Underpinnings|20
3|3 Ethiopian FDI Law and Regulation|23
4|3.1 Entry, Establishment and Operation of Foreign Investment|24
4|3.2 Treatment and Protection of Investors|26
5|3.2.1 Standards of Treatment of Investment and Investors|27
5|3.2.2 Protection of Investment from Expropriation|28
3|4 Legal and Institutional Reforms and Assertive Interventions|32
4|4.1 Context: Ambitious Policy|32
4|4.2 Legal and Institutional Reforms|33
4|4.3 Assertive Intervention: The Case of Building Industrial Parks|34
3|5 Some Challenges and State Responses|35
4|5.1 Land Management Practices, Issues and Responses|36
4|5.2 Some Interpretative, Technical and Procedural Issues|40
3|6 Conclusions|44
3|References|47
2|Comparative Perspective on Exhaustible Resource Development in Ethiopia: Lessons from the Norwegian Legal Framework and Experience|52
3|1 Introduction|52
3|2 Overview of Ethiopian Petroleum Resources and Law|56
4|2.1 Petroleum Resources and Their Place in the Ethiopian Economy|56
4|2.2 Petroleum Resource Extraction Framework|58
3|3 The Concepts of Sustainable Development and Optimising Extraction|60
4|3.1 Sustainable Development|60
4|3.2 Optimising Petroleum Extraction for Sustainable Development|61
3|4 Law and the Optimisation of Petroleum Extraction|62
3|5 Ethiopian Law and Optimal Extraction of Petroleum: A Comparative Analysis|63
4|5.1 An Introduction to the Structures of the Legal Framework|63
4|5.2 The Structure of the Ethiopian Legal Framework and Sustainable Development: A Norwegian Perspective|65
4|5.3 Imbuing Policy in the Law|75
3|6 Conclusion|77
3|References|78
4|Books, Articles and Web Sites|78
4|Legal Instruments|80
4|Australia|80
4|Ethiopia|81
4|Norway|81
4|United Nations|81
2|The GERD and the Revival of the Egyptian–Sudanese Dispute over the Nile Waters|82
3|1 Introduction|82
3|2 Genesis of the Egyptian–Sudanese Dispute over the Nile Waters: The Gezira Scheme|84
3|3 The 1959 Nile Waters Agreement: An Alliance Under Hydrohegemony?|88
3|4 Sudan’s Embarrassment and Dilemma over Its Unused Share of the Nile Waters|92
3|5 The Nile Basin Cooperative Framework Agreement, Water Security, and Current Uses and Rights|94
3|6 The GERD, the Report of the Panel of Experts, and the Two Recommended Studies|96
3|7 The Agreement on Declaration of Principles on the GERD and the Two Studies|99
3|8 The Saga of the Two Studies Continues: The Khartoum Document|101
3|9 Current Uses and Current Rights and the Baseline Data for the Two Studies|103
3|10 Conclusion|107
3|References|111
2|The Challenge of Overlapping Regional Economic Communities in Africa: Lessons for the Continental Free Trade Area from the Failures of the Tripartite Free Trade Area|114
3|1 Introduction|115
3|2 The African Regional Integration Agenda in Brief|116
4|2.1 The Abuja Treaty|118
3|3 The Challenge of Multiple Membership in RECs and Successive Attempts to Address It|121
4|3.1 The Three RECs: COMESA, EAC, and SADC|123
4|3.2 The AEC and the RECs: From a Moratorium on Recognition to Further Rationalization|127
4|3.3 From Rationalization to Merger|129
3|4 The Tripartite Initiative and Its Unfulfilled Promise|131
4|4.1 What Went Wrong with the TFTA Vision?|134
4|4.2 What Can the CFTA Learn from the TFTA Experience?|139
3|5 Concluding Remarks and Lessons for the CFTA Negotiators|140
3|References|142
2|Like Fish in a Stream? Considering the Agency of the UN Peacekeepers of the Global South: Rwanda and India as Case Studies|145
3|1 Introduction|145
3|2 Theoretical Framework|148
3|3 Case Study of India and Rwanda|150
3|4 Analysis|161
3|5 Conclusion|166
3|References|167
1|Part III: Current Development|172
2|The Kenya/Somalia Maritime Boundary Delimitation Dispute|173
3|1 Introduction|173
3|2 The Dispute|174
3|3 Kenya’s Preliminary Objections|176
3|4 Prospects of the Case|179
3|5 The Dispute and Maritime Delimitation Practice in Africa|182
3|6 Conclusion|183
3|References|184
2|The ICC and Africa: Should the Latter Remain Engaged?|186
3|1 Introduction|186
3|2 Prosecutorial Policy and the Perils of Selective Justice|189
3|3 The Threats of Withdrawals: From a Negative to a Positive Impact?|191
3|4 Africa’s Contribution to the Development of International Criminal Law|195
3|5 Tailoring an Alternative/or a Parallel Criminal Justice in Africa?|198
3|6 Conclusion|200
3|References|201
1|Part IV: Case Report|203
2|Case Note on PetroTrans Company Ltd. v. Ministry of Mines of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia|204
3|1 Introduction|204
3|2 Background to the Dispute|205
3|3 The Arbitration|206
3|4 The Arbitral Jurisprudence of Petroleum in Ethiopia|207
3|5 Conclusion|209
3|References|209
1|Part V: Book Review|210
2|Zeray Yihdego, Alistair Rieu-Clarke and Ana Elisa Cascão (eds.): The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and the Nile Basin—Implications for Transboundary Water Cooperation|211
2|Won L. Kidane: The Culture of International Arbitration|217
3|Reference|221
1|Part VI: UN Document with Commentary|222
2|UN Security Council Resolution 2378 (2017) and the Progressive Peacekeeping Agenda: A Commentary|223
3|Resolution 2378 (2017) on Peacekeeping Reform|226
3|References|231