File #2653: "2019_Book_NetherlandsYearbookOfInternati.pdf"
Text
1|Board of Editors|6
2|Aims and Scope|7
2|T.M.C. Asser Instituut|7
1|Contents|9
1|Populism and International Law|14
1|1 Populism and International Law: What Backlash and Which Rubicon?|15
2|Abstract|15
2|1.1 Introduction|16
2|1.2 Populism and International Law|17
2|1.3 Historical Perspective|23
2|1.4 Papers Introduced and Summarised|25
2|References|28
1|2 Trump, International Trade and Populism|30
2|Abstract|30
2|2.1 Introduction|31
2|2.2 Populism, Neoliberalism and Construction of Truth|33
2|2.3 Trump and International Trade Governance|37
2|2.4 Trump’s Neoliberal Populism|46
2|2.5 Conclusion|54
2|References|54
1|3 Populist Paranoia and International Law|56
2|Abstract|56
2|3.1 Introduction|57
2|3.2 A Genealogy of Populism in the USA|60
2|3.3 Populism and International Relations|61
2|3.4 The Constitution, Populism, and International Law|63
2|3.5 Trumpian Populism and International Law|66
2|3.6 Paranoia and International Law|70
2|3.7 Towards a Populist International Law?|74
2|References|76
1|4 Is There a ‘Populist’ International Law (in Latin America)?|79
2|Abstract|79
2|4.1 Introduction|80
2|4.2 Latin American ‘Classical Populism’ at the International Level – Between Pragmatic Self-assurance and Proactive Tercermundismo|85
3|4.2.1 Peronismo’s Third Position or Semi-peripherical Pragmatism|86
3|4.2.2 Mexico’s Populist Foreign Policy in the 1970s: The Promotion of a New International Economic Order (NIEO)|90
2|4.3 The ‘New Latin American Left’: Attempts at Decolonising Global Law|92
3|4.3.1 The Counter-Coalition Called ‘ALBA-TCP’|93
3|4.3.2 Evo Morales and the Emergence of a Global Law of Nature|95
2|4.4 Conclusion|100
2|References|102
1|5 Populism, International Law and the End of Keep Calm and Carry on Lawyering|106
2|Abstract|106
2|5.1 Introduction|107
2|5.2 Internationalists versus Populists: A View from Above|110
2|5.3 International Lawyers as the Elites: A View from Below|114
2|5.4 International Legal Organisations: A Structural View|115
2|5.5 Unsettling Populist versus Internationalist Binaries|119
2|5.6 Populism as a Tactic for a Multilateralism of Solidarity|123
2|5.7 Conclusion|127
2|References|128
1|6 People, Politics and Populism in International Criminal Law: The Mungiki as Kenyan Ethnos and Kenyan Demos|131
2|Abstract|131
2|6.1 Introduction|132
2|6.2 People in the United Nations Charter and International Criminal Law|136
2|6.3 Female Circumcision and the Politics of Patriarchy|138
2|6.4 The Faustian Pact, Political Violence and Law|142
2|6.5 Conclusion|148
2|References|148
1|7 Populism and Human Rights|151
2|Abstract|151
2|7.1 Introduction|152
2|7.2 The Concept of Populism and the Populist View(s) on Human Rights|153
3|7.2.1 Overview of the Studies of Populism|154
3|7.2.2 Characteristics of Populism|156
3|7.2.3 Populism in Today’s World|159
3|7.2.4 Populist View(s) on Human Rights|161
2|7.3 Arguments Used by Populists to Criticize Human Rights|163
3|7.3.1 Security Argument|164
3|7.3.2 Legitimacy Argument|169
3|7.3.3 Democracy Argument|174
2|7.4 Concluding Remarks|179
2|References|180
1|8 Reclaiming the Keys to the Kingdom (of the World): Evangelicals and Human Rights in Latin America|183
2|Abstract|183
2|8.1 Introduction|184
2|8.2 Protestantism in Latin America|186
2|8.3 ‘Evangelicals’ Enter the Picture|187
2|8.4 Evangelicals and the ‘Private’ Mindset: Chile (1970s) and Colombia (1990s)|192
3|8.4.1 Chile, 1970s: Evangelicals and Faith as a Private Matter|193
3|8.4.2 Colombia, 1990s: Evangelical Rights and Neo-constitutionalism|197
2|8.5 The Public Mindset: LGBTI Rights and ‘Gender Ideology’|200
2|8.6 Conclusion: Reclaiming the Keys to the Kingdom (of the World)|208
2|References|211
1|9 Addressing Economic Populism Through Law – A Case Study of the World Development Report 2017|216
2|Abstract|216
2|9.1 Introduction|217
2|9.2 The World Bank’s Engagement with Law|219
2|9.3 Populist Economic Nationalism|222
2|9.4 Interactions of Populist Economic Nationalism with the Domestic and International Legal Institutions|224
2|9.5 Conclusion|226
2|References|226
1|Dutch Practice|228
1|10 Climate Action as Positive Human Rights Obligation: The Appeals Judgment in Urgenda v the Netherlands|229
2|Abstract|230
2|10.1 Introduction|230
2|10.2 The Admissibility of Urgenda’s Claims|232
3|10.2.1 Direct Applicability of the ECHR|232
3|10.2.2 Future Generations and People Abroad|234
3|10.2.3 Uptake|234
2|10.3 Articles 2 and 8 ECHR’s Duty of Care to Protect Against Dangers of Climate Change|235
3|10.3.1 The Strasbourg Standard for the Prevention of Future Environmental Dangers|236
3|10.3.2 Climate Change: A Real Threat Resulting in Serious Risk|238
3|10.3.3 Preventing Infringement ‘as Far as Possible’|239
2|10.4 Law, Facts and Civil Procedure|240
3|10.4.1 25% as the Unassailable Minimum|240
3|10.4.2 Negative Emissions|241
3|10.4.3 Dismissal of the State’s Other Objections|242
2|10.5 Separation of Powers|244
3|10.5.1 The Courts’ Considerations|244
3|10.5.2 Did the Court Overstep the Separation of Powers by Misinterpreting the Law?|246
3|10.5.3 Should Courts Sometimes Refrain from Delivering Legally Correct Decisions?|247
2|References|249
1|11 Pursuing Justice for MH17: The Role of the Netherlands|251
2|Abstract|251
2|11.1 Introduction|252
2|11.2 Developments: 2014–2018|253
2|11.3 The Legal Case Against Russia|257
3|11.3.1 Involvement in Shooting Down MH17|258
3|11.3.2 Duty to Conduct Effective Investigations|264
3|11.3.3 Bringing a Case Against Russia|266
2|11.4 The Legal Case Against Ukraine|271
2|11.5 The Dutch Pursuit for Justice|274
2|References|276
1|12 What a Drag(net): Dutch Surveillance Laws in the Light of European Union Data Protection Law|277
2|Abstract|277
2|12.1 Introduction|278
2|12.2 Background|280
2|12.3 Content of the New Law|281
2|12.4 A Referendum and Subsequent Court Action|282
2|12.5 The ISS Act 2017 and EU Data Protection Principles|284
3|12.5.1 Lawful Processing|284
3|12.5.2 Purpose Specification and Limitation|285
3|12.5.3 Data Quality|285
4|12.5.3.1 Data Minimisation|286
4|12.5.3.2 Data Retention|286
3|12.5.4 Fair Data Processing|288
2|12.6 Conclusion|289
2|References|289
1|INTERNATIONAL|290
1|NATIONAL|293
2|Aims and Scope|7
2|T.M.C. Asser Instituut|7
1|Contents|9
1|Populism and International Law|14
1|1 Populism and International Law: What Backlash and Which Rubicon?|15
2|Abstract|15
2|1.1 Introduction|16
2|1.2 Populism and International Law|17
2|1.3 Historical Perspective|23
2|1.4 Papers Introduced and Summarised|25
2|References|28
1|2 Trump, International Trade and Populism|30
2|Abstract|30
2|2.1 Introduction|31
2|2.2 Populism, Neoliberalism and Construction of Truth|33
2|2.3 Trump and International Trade Governance|37
2|2.4 Trump’s Neoliberal Populism|46
2|2.5 Conclusion|54
2|References|54
1|3 Populist Paranoia and International Law|56
2|Abstract|56
2|3.1 Introduction|57
2|3.2 A Genealogy of Populism in the USA|60
2|3.3 Populism and International Relations|61
2|3.4 The Constitution, Populism, and International Law|63
2|3.5 Trumpian Populism and International Law|66
2|3.6 Paranoia and International Law|70
2|3.7 Towards a Populist International Law?|74
2|References|76
1|4 Is There a ‘Populist’ International Law (in Latin America)?|79
2|Abstract|79
2|4.1 Introduction|80
2|4.2 Latin American ‘Classical Populism’ at the International Level – Between Pragmatic Self-assurance and Proactive Tercermundismo|85
3|4.2.1 Peronismo’s Third Position or Semi-peripherical Pragmatism|86
3|4.2.2 Mexico’s Populist Foreign Policy in the 1970s: The Promotion of a New International Economic Order (NIEO)|90
2|4.3 The ‘New Latin American Left’: Attempts at Decolonising Global Law|92
3|4.3.1 The Counter-Coalition Called ‘ALBA-TCP’|93
3|4.3.2 Evo Morales and the Emergence of a Global Law of Nature|95
2|4.4 Conclusion|100
2|References|102
1|5 Populism, International Law and the End of Keep Calm and Carry on Lawyering|106
2|Abstract|106
2|5.1 Introduction|107
2|5.2 Internationalists versus Populists: A View from Above|110
2|5.3 International Lawyers as the Elites: A View from Below|114
2|5.4 International Legal Organisations: A Structural View|115
2|5.5 Unsettling Populist versus Internationalist Binaries|119
2|5.6 Populism as a Tactic for a Multilateralism of Solidarity|123
2|5.7 Conclusion|127
2|References|128
1|6 People, Politics and Populism in International Criminal Law: The Mungiki as Kenyan Ethnos and Kenyan Demos|131
2|Abstract|131
2|6.1 Introduction|132
2|6.2 People in the United Nations Charter and International Criminal Law|136
2|6.3 Female Circumcision and the Politics of Patriarchy|138
2|6.4 The Faustian Pact, Political Violence and Law|142
2|6.5 Conclusion|148
2|References|148
1|7 Populism and Human Rights|151
2|Abstract|151
2|7.1 Introduction|152
2|7.2 The Concept of Populism and the Populist View(s) on Human Rights|153
3|7.2.1 Overview of the Studies of Populism|154
3|7.2.2 Characteristics of Populism|156
3|7.2.3 Populism in Today’s World|159
3|7.2.4 Populist View(s) on Human Rights|161
2|7.3 Arguments Used by Populists to Criticize Human Rights|163
3|7.3.1 Security Argument|164
3|7.3.2 Legitimacy Argument|169
3|7.3.3 Democracy Argument|174
2|7.4 Concluding Remarks|179
2|References|180
1|8 Reclaiming the Keys to the Kingdom (of the World): Evangelicals and Human Rights in Latin America|183
2|Abstract|183
2|8.1 Introduction|184
2|8.2 Protestantism in Latin America|186
2|8.3 ‘Evangelicals’ Enter the Picture|187
2|8.4 Evangelicals and the ‘Private’ Mindset: Chile (1970s) and Colombia (1990s)|192
3|8.4.1 Chile, 1970s: Evangelicals and Faith as a Private Matter|193
3|8.4.2 Colombia, 1990s: Evangelical Rights and Neo-constitutionalism|197
2|8.5 The Public Mindset: LGBTI Rights and ‘Gender Ideology’|200
2|8.6 Conclusion: Reclaiming the Keys to the Kingdom (of the World)|208
2|References|211
1|9 Addressing Economic Populism Through Law – A Case Study of the World Development Report 2017|216
2|Abstract|216
2|9.1 Introduction|217
2|9.2 The World Bank’s Engagement with Law|219
2|9.3 Populist Economic Nationalism|222
2|9.4 Interactions of Populist Economic Nationalism with the Domestic and International Legal Institutions|224
2|9.5 Conclusion|226
2|References|226
1|Dutch Practice|228
1|10 Climate Action as Positive Human Rights Obligation: The Appeals Judgment in Urgenda v the Netherlands|229
2|Abstract|230
2|10.1 Introduction|230
2|10.2 The Admissibility of Urgenda’s Claims|232
3|10.2.1 Direct Applicability of the ECHR|232
3|10.2.2 Future Generations and People Abroad|234
3|10.2.3 Uptake|234
2|10.3 Articles 2 and 8 ECHR’s Duty of Care to Protect Against Dangers of Climate Change|235
3|10.3.1 The Strasbourg Standard for the Prevention of Future Environmental Dangers|236
3|10.3.2 Climate Change: A Real Threat Resulting in Serious Risk|238
3|10.3.3 Preventing Infringement ‘as Far as Possible’|239
2|10.4 Law, Facts and Civil Procedure|240
3|10.4.1 25% as the Unassailable Minimum|240
3|10.4.2 Negative Emissions|241
3|10.4.3 Dismissal of the State’s Other Objections|242
2|10.5 Separation of Powers|244
3|10.5.1 The Courts’ Considerations|244
3|10.5.2 Did the Court Overstep the Separation of Powers by Misinterpreting the Law?|246
3|10.5.3 Should Courts Sometimes Refrain from Delivering Legally Correct Decisions?|247
2|References|249
1|11 Pursuing Justice for MH17: The Role of the Netherlands|251
2|Abstract|251
2|11.1 Introduction|252
2|11.2 Developments: 2014–2018|253
2|11.3 The Legal Case Against Russia|257
3|11.3.1 Involvement in Shooting Down MH17|258
3|11.3.2 Duty to Conduct Effective Investigations|264
3|11.3.3 Bringing a Case Against Russia|266
2|11.4 The Legal Case Against Ukraine|271
2|11.5 The Dutch Pursuit for Justice|274
2|References|276
1|12 What a Drag(net): Dutch Surveillance Laws in the Light of European Union Data Protection Law|277
2|Abstract|277
2|12.1 Introduction|278
2|12.2 Background|280
2|12.3 Content of the New Law|281
2|12.4 A Referendum and Subsequent Court Action|282
2|12.5 The ISS Act 2017 and EU Data Protection Principles|284
3|12.5.1 Lawful Processing|284
3|12.5.2 Purpose Specification and Limitation|285
3|12.5.3 Data Quality|285
4|12.5.3.1 Data Minimisation|286
4|12.5.3.2 Data Retention|286
3|12.5.4 Fair Data Processing|288
2|12.6 Conclusion|289
2|References|289
1|INTERNATIONAL|290
1|NATIONAL|293