File #2711: "2019_Book_LawPublicPoliciesAndComplexSys.pdf"
Text
1|Foreword|6
2|A Significant Contribution to Sustainability Science|6
1|Scientific Committee of the Publication|11
1|Contents|13
1|Editors and Contributors|15
1|Chapter 1: Public Policies, Law, Complexities and Networks|18
2|1.1 Introduction|19
2|1.2 Complexity Faced by Jurists|20
2|1.3 Complexity in Action and Policy Analysis|21
2|1.4 Complexity and Networks|23
2|1.5 A Reticular Vision of the Volume|25
2|References|26
1|Part I: Complexity Faced by Jurists|28
2|Chapter 2: Codification, Between Legal Complexity and Computer Science Agility|29
3|2.1 Opening Remarks|29
3|2.2 Complexity of Law: Outcomes and Prospects|31
4|2.2.1 Complexity, Result from a Norm Network of Increasing Density|31
4|2.2.2 Complexity, Product of the Multiplication of Normative Authorities|32
4|2.2.3 Other Perspectives on Law Coming from Complexity|34
3|2.3 Public Policies of Simplification and Codification of the Law|34
4|2.3.1 The Variety of Political Solutions|34
4|2.3.2 Simplification of Law as a Policy|35
4|2.3.3 Codification Policy|36
4|2.3.4 Code, Between Complexity and Simplification of Law|37
3|2.4 Computer Science Agility: A New Analytical Approach|39
3|2.5 Reticular Law, Another Modelling of Law|41
4|2.5.1 Introduction|41
4|2.5.2 Identification of Law Resources: ELI|41
4|2.5.3 The Big Diversity of Legal Links: Example of Reverse References|42
4|2.5.4 Application: Emergence of an Area of Law|44
5|Introduction|44
5|Codified Legal Ecosystem of the Code of Criminal Procedure|44
3|2.6 Conclusion|48
3|References|48
2|Chapter 3: Organizational Consciousness Versus Artificial Consciousness|50
3|3.1 ``How Do Organizations Think?´´|51
3|3.2 Organizations Networks ``Health-Environment´´ in Southeast Asia|52
3|3.3 Multifunctional Organization Network|54
4|3.3.1 Network Induced by the Role and Missions of Organizations|55
4|3.3.2 Network Induced by the Organization´s Governance|57
4|3.3.3 Network Induced by the Organization´s Training Courses They Provide|60
4|3.3.4 Assessment of SEAMEO´s Organizations|62
3|3.4 Organizational Versus Artificial Consciousness: Open Debate|62
3|3.5 Discussion|65
3|3.6 Conclusion|67
3|Annex|68
3|References|70
2|Chapter 4: The Entity-Process Framework for Integrated Agent-Based Modeling of Social-Ecological Systems|72
3|4.1 Introduction|73
3|4.2 The Entity-Process Framework for SES Modeling|76
4|4.2.1 Models´ Structure: Entities and Relationships|77
4|4.2.2 Models´ Dynamics: Processes|78
4|4.2.3 (De)composition of Models into Structure and Dynamics|79
4|4.2.4 Conceptual, Concrete and Simulation Models|80
4|4.2.5 Indicators and Scenarios|81
3|4.3 Expression of Conceptual and Concrete Models|83
4|4.3.1 Structural Models: Actor-Resource Diagrams|83
4|4.3.2 Dynamic Models: Process Diagrams|84
4|4.3.3 Interaction Diagrams|84
3|4.4 Computational Semantics of the Meta-model: Simulation Model|88
3|4.5 Discussion|89
4|4.5.1 Integration and Sharing of Heterogeneous Knowledge|90
4|4.5.2 Reliability of Simulation Results|91
4|4.5.3 Expressiveness|91
4|4.5.4 Model Modularity and Organization of Modeling Processes|92
3|4.6 Conclusion|94
3|Appendix|95
4|Entities|95
4|Processes|96
4|Template for the Description of an Entity|97
4|Template for the Description of a Process|97
3|References|97
1|Part II: Complexity in Action and Policy Analysis|102
2|Chapter 5: An Interdisciplinary Study of Leptospirosis Surveillance Systems in Three Regencies of East Java, Indonesia|103
3|5.1 Background|104
3|5.2 Methods|106
4|5.2.1 Study Setting|106
4|5.2.2 Study Population|106
4|5.2.3 Questionnaires|108
4|5.2.4 Ethical Considerations|109
3|5.3 Results|109
4|5.3.1 General Demographic and Descriptive Statistics|109
4|5.3.2 Reported Associations of Leptospirosis|109
3|5.4 Discussion|111
4|5.4.1 Socio-Sanitation Deprivation|111
4|5.4.2 Distinct Surveillance Systems|113
4|5.4.3 Limitations|115
3|5.5 Conclusion|115
3|Questionnaire|117
3|References|123
2|Chapter 6: Complexity of Scenarios of Future Health: Integrating Policies and Laws|127
3|6.1 Introduction|128
3|6.2 The Need of Process-Based Prospective Scenarios|129
3|6.3 Integrating Policies and Regulations in Environment and Health Models|132
4|6.3.1 On Policy Modelling|133
4|6.3.2 Entangled Process Dynamics|134
4|6.3.3 Integrated Impact Assessment Scenarios|137
3|6.4 Science-Policy Dialogue for Informed Policies and Law|139
3|6.5 Conclusion|141
3|References|141
2|Chapter 7: Architectural Pattern for Health Forecasting, Surveillance and Early Warning Systems|146
3|7.1 Introduction|146
3|7.2 The Problem Scope: The Population Exposure|148
3|7.3 System Responsibilities According to the InVS in France|151
3|7.4 Which Architecture for Such a System?|154
3|7.5 Discussion and Conclusion|159
3|References|164
2|Chapter 8: Water Management and Development: The Limits of Coordination|166
3|8.1 Introduction|167
3|8.2 Water Management and Development|168
4|8.2.1 Water Policy in France|168
4|8.2.2 A Partial Success|169
4|8.2.3 The Ontological Substrate of Water Policy|169
3|8.3 Resources, Actors, Norms|170
4|8.3.1 A Normative Ontology|170
4|8.3.2 Manage and Develop Resources|171
4|8.3.3 Water Actors and Their Coordination|172
3|8.4 Value of Partial Approaches|174
4|8.4.1 Embedding of Governance|174
4|8.4.2 Embedding in Economy|175
4|8.4.3 Embedding in Engineering|177
3|8.5 Water Services and Data|178
4|8.5.1 Services et Innovations|179
4|8.5.2 Water Data|179
4|8.5.3 Data Needs for Management Tools|180
3|8.6 Support of Modeling|181
4|8.6.1 Integrative Modeling|182
4|8.6.2 Modeling Collective Action and Coordination|182
4|8.6.3 Concrete Perspectives|183
3|8.7 Conclusion|183
3|References|185
2|Chapter 9: Formal Analysis of the Conflictive Play of Actors Regarding the Building of a Dam|189
3|9.1 Introduction|189
3|9.2 The SocLab Model of a System of Organized Action|191
3|9.3 The Actors of the Model|194
4|9.3.1 The State|196
4|9.3.2 CG: The Council of Tarn Department, Local Authorities and Pro-Dam Farmers|196
4|9.3.3 The Coteaux de Gascogne Development Company (CACG)|197
4|9.3.4 The Testet Collective|198
4|9.3.5 The Zadists|198
4|9.3.6 Other Actors|199
3|9.4 Quantification of the Model|200
4|9.4.1 The State|200
4|9.4.2 The CG|200
4|9.4.3 The CACG|202
4|9.4.4 The Testet Collective|202
4|9.4.5 The Zadists|202
3|9.5 Model Analysis|203
4|9.5.1 Structural Analysis|203
4|9.5.2 Simulation Results|206
3|9.6 Models for Moderation of the State-Zadist Conflict|207
3|9.7 Conclusion|210
3|Appendix|212
3|References|213
1|Part III: Complexity and Networks|215
2|Chapter 10: Exploiting the Web of Law|216
3|10.1 Introduction|216
3|10.2 Creating a Web of Law|217
4|10.2.1 Legal Portals|219
4|10.2.2 The Dutch Case Law Portal|220
4|10.2.3 Recommending Sources of Law|221
4|10.2.4 A Formative Evaluation|222
3|10.3 Adding Other Document Features|222
4|10.3.1 Reference Similarity Combined with Text Similarity|224
5|Formative Evaluation|225
4|10.3.2 Network Analysis Combined with Topic Modelling|226
5|Formative Evaluation|227
3|10.4 Conclusions|228
3|References|230
2|Chapter 11: Environmental and Trade Regimes: Comparison of Hypergraphs Modeling the Ratifications of UN Multilateral Treaties|231
3|11.1 Introduction|232
3|11.2 Ratification of Trade and Environmental Treaties|234
4|11.2.1 The UN Convergence on Trade and Environment|234
4|11.2.2 Three Factors of the Interlocking of the Two Regimes|234
4|11.2.3 However Two Orthogonal Directions|236
3|11.3 Data Analysis with Hypergraphs|237
4|11.3.1 Previous Results|238
4|11.3.2 Directed Graphs and Hypergraphs: Definitions|239
4|11.3.3 Analysis of a Directed Hypergraph|241
3|11.4 Hypergraph-Based Comparison of Environment and Trade Ratifications|243
4|11.4.1 Modeling by Hypergraphs|243
4|11.4.2 Results in the Field of the Environment|243
4|11.4.3 Results in the Field of Trade|245
4|11.4.4 Environment Versus Trade Results|246
3|11.5 Discussion|248
3|11.6 Conclusion|250
3|References|251
2|Chapter 12: How to Compare Bundles of National Environmental and Development Indexes?|253
3|12.1 Introduction|254
3|12.2 Some Development and Environmental Indicators|256
4|12.2.1 Indexes of Development|258
4|12.2.2 Environmental Indicators|259
4|12.2.3 The Set of Countries|261
3|12.3 Partial Orders and Bundle of Indexes|262
3|12.4 Development and Environmental Partial Orders|265
4|12.4.1 Combining Development Indexes|265
4|12.4.2 Combining Environmental Indexes|266
4|12.4.3 Combining Development and Environmental Indexes|268
3|12.5 Discussion|268
3|12.6 Conclusion|272
3|References|274
2|Chapter 13: Network Theory and Legal Information ``for´´ Reality: A Triple Support for Deliberation, Decision Making, and Lega...|276
3|13.1 Introduction|276
3|13.2 Networks, Information, Law, and Reality|278
3|13.3 A Network Approach to Legal Information ``for´´ Reality|281
4|13.3.1 Support for Policy-Makers|282
4|13.3.2 The Price of Ignoring|283
4|13.3.3 The Price of Ignoring 2.0|285
3|13.4 Conclusions|286
3|References|288
2|A Significant Contribution to Sustainability Science|6
1|Scientific Committee of the Publication|11
1|Contents|13
1|Editors and Contributors|15
1|Chapter 1: Public Policies, Law, Complexities and Networks|18
2|1.1 Introduction|19
2|1.2 Complexity Faced by Jurists|20
2|1.3 Complexity in Action and Policy Analysis|21
2|1.4 Complexity and Networks|23
2|1.5 A Reticular Vision of the Volume|25
2|References|26
1|Part I: Complexity Faced by Jurists|28
2|Chapter 2: Codification, Between Legal Complexity and Computer Science Agility|29
3|2.1 Opening Remarks|29
3|2.2 Complexity of Law: Outcomes and Prospects|31
4|2.2.1 Complexity, Result from a Norm Network of Increasing Density|31
4|2.2.2 Complexity, Product of the Multiplication of Normative Authorities|32
4|2.2.3 Other Perspectives on Law Coming from Complexity|34
3|2.3 Public Policies of Simplification and Codification of the Law|34
4|2.3.1 The Variety of Political Solutions|34
4|2.3.2 Simplification of Law as a Policy|35
4|2.3.3 Codification Policy|36
4|2.3.4 Code, Between Complexity and Simplification of Law|37
3|2.4 Computer Science Agility: A New Analytical Approach|39
3|2.5 Reticular Law, Another Modelling of Law|41
4|2.5.1 Introduction|41
4|2.5.2 Identification of Law Resources: ELI|41
4|2.5.3 The Big Diversity of Legal Links: Example of Reverse References|42
4|2.5.4 Application: Emergence of an Area of Law|44
5|Introduction|44
5|Codified Legal Ecosystem of the Code of Criminal Procedure|44
3|2.6 Conclusion|48
3|References|48
2|Chapter 3: Organizational Consciousness Versus Artificial Consciousness|50
3|3.1 ``How Do Organizations Think?´´|51
3|3.2 Organizations Networks ``Health-Environment´´ in Southeast Asia|52
3|3.3 Multifunctional Organization Network|54
4|3.3.1 Network Induced by the Role and Missions of Organizations|55
4|3.3.2 Network Induced by the Organization´s Governance|57
4|3.3.3 Network Induced by the Organization´s Training Courses They Provide|60
4|3.3.4 Assessment of SEAMEO´s Organizations|62
3|3.4 Organizational Versus Artificial Consciousness: Open Debate|62
3|3.5 Discussion|65
3|3.6 Conclusion|67
3|Annex|68
3|References|70
2|Chapter 4: The Entity-Process Framework for Integrated Agent-Based Modeling of Social-Ecological Systems|72
3|4.1 Introduction|73
3|4.2 The Entity-Process Framework for SES Modeling|76
4|4.2.1 Models´ Structure: Entities and Relationships|77
4|4.2.2 Models´ Dynamics: Processes|78
4|4.2.3 (De)composition of Models into Structure and Dynamics|79
4|4.2.4 Conceptual, Concrete and Simulation Models|80
4|4.2.5 Indicators and Scenarios|81
3|4.3 Expression of Conceptual and Concrete Models|83
4|4.3.1 Structural Models: Actor-Resource Diagrams|83
4|4.3.2 Dynamic Models: Process Diagrams|84
4|4.3.3 Interaction Diagrams|84
3|4.4 Computational Semantics of the Meta-model: Simulation Model|88
3|4.5 Discussion|89
4|4.5.1 Integration and Sharing of Heterogeneous Knowledge|90
4|4.5.2 Reliability of Simulation Results|91
4|4.5.3 Expressiveness|91
4|4.5.4 Model Modularity and Organization of Modeling Processes|92
3|4.6 Conclusion|94
3|Appendix|95
4|Entities|95
4|Processes|96
4|Template for the Description of an Entity|97
4|Template for the Description of a Process|97
3|References|97
1|Part II: Complexity in Action and Policy Analysis|102
2|Chapter 5: An Interdisciplinary Study of Leptospirosis Surveillance Systems in Three Regencies of East Java, Indonesia|103
3|5.1 Background|104
3|5.2 Methods|106
4|5.2.1 Study Setting|106
4|5.2.2 Study Population|106
4|5.2.3 Questionnaires|108
4|5.2.4 Ethical Considerations|109
3|5.3 Results|109
4|5.3.1 General Demographic and Descriptive Statistics|109
4|5.3.2 Reported Associations of Leptospirosis|109
3|5.4 Discussion|111
4|5.4.1 Socio-Sanitation Deprivation|111
4|5.4.2 Distinct Surveillance Systems|113
4|5.4.3 Limitations|115
3|5.5 Conclusion|115
3|Questionnaire|117
3|References|123
2|Chapter 6: Complexity of Scenarios of Future Health: Integrating Policies and Laws|127
3|6.1 Introduction|128
3|6.2 The Need of Process-Based Prospective Scenarios|129
3|6.3 Integrating Policies and Regulations in Environment and Health Models|132
4|6.3.1 On Policy Modelling|133
4|6.3.2 Entangled Process Dynamics|134
4|6.3.3 Integrated Impact Assessment Scenarios|137
3|6.4 Science-Policy Dialogue for Informed Policies and Law|139
3|6.5 Conclusion|141
3|References|141
2|Chapter 7: Architectural Pattern for Health Forecasting, Surveillance and Early Warning Systems|146
3|7.1 Introduction|146
3|7.2 The Problem Scope: The Population Exposure|148
3|7.3 System Responsibilities According to the InVS in France|151
3|7.4 Which Architecture for Such a System?|154
3|7.5 Discussion and Conclusion|159
3|References|164
2|Chapter 8: Water Management and Development: The Limits of Coordination|166
3|8.1 Introduction|167
3|8.2 Water Management and Development|168
4|8.2.1 Water Policy in France|168
4|8.2.2 A Partial Success|169
4|8.2.3 The Ontological Substrate of Water Policy|169
3|8.3 Resources, Actors, Norms|170
4|8.3.1 A Normative Ontology|170
4|8.3.2 Manage and Develop Resources|171
4|8.3.3 Water Actors and Their Coordination|172
3|8.4 Value of Partial Approaches|174
4|8.4.1 Embedding of Governance|174
4|8.4.2 Embedding in Economy|175
4|8.4.3 Embedding in Engineering|177
3|8.5 Water Services and Data|178
4|8.5.1 Services et Innovations|179
4|8.5.2 Water Data|179
4|8.5.3 Data Needs for Management Tools|180
3|8.6 Support of Modeling|181
4|8.6.1 Integrative Modeling|182
4|8.6.2 Modeling Collective Action and Coordination|182
4|8.6.3 Concrete Perspectives|183
3|8.7 Conclusion|183
3|References|185
2|Chapter 9: Formal Analysis of the Conflictive Play of Actors Regarding the Building of a Dam|189
3|9.1 Introduction|189
3|9.2 The SocLab Model of a System of Organized Action|191
3|9.3 The Actors of the Model|194
4|9.3.1 The State|196
4|9.3.2 CG: The Council of Tarn Department, Local Authorities and Pro-Dam Farmers|196
4|9.3.3 The Coteaux de Gascogne Development Company (CACG)|197
4|9.3.4 The Testet Collective|198
4|9.3.5 The Zadists|198
4|9.3.6 Other Actors|199
3|9.4 Quantification of the Model|200
4|9.4.1 The State|200
4|9.4.2 The CG|200
4|9.4.3 The CACG|202
4|9.4.4 The Testet Collective|202
4|9.4.5 The Zadists|202
3|9.5 Model Analysis|203
4|9.5.1 Structural Analysis|203
4|9.5.2 Simulation Results|206
3|9.6 Models for Moderation of the State-Zadist Conflict|207
3|9.7 Conclusion|210
3|Appendix|212
3|References|213
1|Part III: Complexity and Networks|215
2|Chapter 10: Exploiting the Web of Law|216
3|10.1 Introduction|216
3|10.2 Creating a Web of Law|217
4|10.2.1 Legal Portals|219
4|10.2.2 The Dutch Case Law Portal|220
4|10.2.3 Recommending Sources of Law|221
4|10.2.4 A Formative Evaluation|222
3|10.3 Adding Other Document Features|222
4|10.3.1 Reference Similarity Combined with Text Similarity|224
5|Formative Evaluation|225
4|10.3.2 Network Analysis Combined with Topic Modelling|226
5|Formative Evaluation|227
3|10.4 Conclusions|228
3|References|230
2|Chapter 11: Environmental and Trade Regimes: Comparison of Hypergraphs Modeling the Ratifications of UN Multilateral Treaties|231
3|11.1 Introduction|232
3|11.2 Ratification of Trade and Environmental Treaties|234
4|11.2.1 The UN Convergence on Trade and Environment|234
4|11.2.2 Three Factors of the Interlocking of the Two Regimes|234
4|11.2.3 However Two Orthogonal Directions|236
3|11.3 Data Analysis with Hypergraphs|237
4|11.3.1 Previous Results|238
4|11.3.2 Directed Graphs and Hypergraphs: Definitions|239
4|11.3.3 Analysis of a Directed Hypergraph|241
3|11.4 Hypergraph-Based Comparison of Environment and Trade Ratifications|243
4|11.4.1 Modeling by Hypergraphs|243
4|11.4.2 Results in the Field of the Environment|243
4|11.4.3 Results in the Field of Trade|245
4|11.4.4 Environment Versus Trade Results|246
3|11.5 Discussion|248
3|11.6 Conclusion|250
3|References|251
2|Chapter 12: How to Compare Bundles of National Environmental and Development Indexes?|253
3|12.1 Introduction|254
3|12.2 Some Development and Environmental Indicators|256
4|12.2.1 Indexes of Development|258
4|12.2.2 Environmental Indicators|259
4|12.2.3 The Set of Countries|261
3|12.3 Partial Orders and Bundle of Indexes|262
3|12.4 Development and Environmental Partial Orders|265
4|12.4.1 Combining Development Indexes|265
4|12.4.2 Combining Environmental Indexes|266
4|12.4.3 Combining Development and Environmental Indexes|268
3|12.5 Discussion|268
3|12.6 Conclusion|272
3|References|274
2|Chapter 13: Network Theory and Legal Information ``for´´ Reality: A Triple Support for Deliberation, Decision Making, and Lega...|276
3|13.1 Introduction|276
3|13.2 Networks, Information, Law, and Reality|278
3|13.3 A Network Approach to Legal Information ``for´´ Reality|281
4|13.3.1 Support for Policy-Makers|282
4|13.3.2 The Price of Ignoring|283
4|13.3.3 The Price of Ignoring 2.0|285
3|13.4 Conclusions|286
3|References|288