File #2714: "2019_Book_LéonDuguitAndTheSocialObligati.pdf"
Text
1|Foreword|7
1|Acknowledgements|9
1|Translator’s Note|11
1|Contents|15
1|Editors and Contributors|17
1|1 Léon Duguit and the Propriété Function Sociale|19
2|1.1 Legal Realism, Social Relations, and Progressive Property|20
2|1.2 Léon Duguit|27
3|1.2.1 Biography|27
3|1.2.2 The Sixth Buenos Aires Lecture|30
2|1.3 Implications for Property|32
3|1.3.1 Concept|32
3|1.3.2 Law|34
2|1.4 Overview of the Book|39
3|1.4.1 Europe|40
3|1.4.2 South America|42
3|1.4.3 North America|44
3|1.4.4 Asia, Africa, and Australia|45
2|References|46
1|2 Translation|52
1|The Importance of the Social Function of Property—Europe|79
1|3 The Importance of the Social Function of Property—France|80
2|3.1 The Socialization of Private Property by the Law|82
3|3.1.1 The Rural and Commercial Properties Put into Service of Economic Exploitation and Environment|83
3|3.1.2 The Urban Property Put into Service of Housing in Harmonious Cities|85
2|3.2 The Doctrinal Reception of the Social Function of Property|89
3|3.2.1 The Expansion Phase|89
3|3.2.2 The Recoil Phase|93
2|References|98
1|4 Duguit and the German Property Law Tradition|102
2|4.1 Introduction|102
2|4.2 Duguit’s Theories in the Soviet Union|104
2|4.3 Duguit’s Theories in Early 20th Century Germany|104
2|4.4 Recognition in German Jurisprudence of the Social and Environmental Context of Property|109
3|4.4.1 Sociological Perspective|109
3|4.4.2 Historical Tradition|110
3|4.4.3 Modern Natural Law|110
2|4.5 Conclusion|121
2|References|122
1|5 The “Social Function of Property” in German Law|125
2|5.1 Concept of Ownership in the 19th Century|125
3|5.1.1 Constitutional-Historical Background|125
3|5.1.2 The Pandectist Conception of Property|126
2|5.2 New Trends: “Der Zweck im Recht” (Ihering)|127
3|5.2.1 Interests of Society Versus Individual Interests|127
3|5.2.2 Changes in the Concept of Property|128
3|5.2.3 Ihering and Duguit|128
2|5.3 Changes in the Concept of Property in Germany|129
3|5.3.1 The Great War as Catalyst|129
3|5.3.2 Shifting the Constitutional Frame|130
2|5.4 Excursus: (No) Reception of Duguit in Germany|132
2|5.5 Social Conditions of Property Rights Under Applicable Law|133
2|References|134
1|6 The Importance of the Social Function of Property—Norway|136
2|6.1 Introduction|136
2|6.2 Legal Precedent|140
2|6.3 Public Law—Legal Standards|143
2|6.4 Private Law—Legal Standards|146
2|6.5 Present Day Situation—Conclusion|152
2|References|154
1|7 The Social Function of Property: Russia|156
2|7.1 Introduction|156
2|7.2 Private Property-Public Ownership and the Commons|159
2|7.3 Revolutionary Communism (1917–1921): The Choice for the Proletarians|162
2|7.4 The Russian Mir, Obshchina or Agrarian Community|164
2|7.5 Soviet Socialist State Property|167
2|7.6 The Patrimonial Features of Power|171
2|7.7 Perestroika and Patrimonialism|172
2|7.8 Towards a New Functionality of Ownership?|176
2|7.9 Conclusion|178
2|References|178
1|The Importance of the Social Function of Property—South America|181
1|8 Liberalism and Property in Colombia: Property as a Right and Property as a Social Function|182
2|8.1 Introduction|182
2|8.2 The Classical Liberal Property System|187
2|8.3 The Mixed System of Property: Classical Liberalism and Interventionist Liberalism|195
2|8.4 The Liberal Interventionist Property System (1991–2011)|205
2|8.5 Conclusion|214
2|References|214
1|9 Tierra y Libertad: The Social Function Doctrine and Land Reform in Latin America|217
2|9.1 Introduction|218
2|9.2 Land Reform: The Legal-Historical and Sociopolitical Context|219
3|9.2.1 Roman Origins|220
3|9.2.2 Land Reform in Latin America: Historical Origins of Land Concentration|223
2|9.3 The Social Function Doctrine as the Legal Basis for Land Reform|231
3|9.3.1 Competing Perspectives on the Role of Property in Human Social Organization|232
3|9.3.2 Application of the Social Function Doctrine to Land Reform in Latin America|239
2|9.4 Recent Developments and Challenges to the Social Function Doctrine|246
3|9.4.1 The International Human Rights Dimension of the Social Function Doctrine|246
3|9.4.2 Accommodating “Sustainable Development”: Ecological Possession and the “Socio-environmental Function” of Land|249
3|9.4.3 Challenges to the Doctrine from the Trade Regime: Social Function and Regulatory Expropriation|251
3|9.4.4 The Social Function Doctrine in the Neoliberal Era|252
2|9.5 Conclusion|255
2|References|256
1|10 A Curious Doctrinal Marriage: the Social Function of Property and the Right to the City in Brazil|263
2|10.1 Social Function in Brazil|264
2|10.2 Social Function and the Right to the City|266
3|10.2.1 Context in Which Duguit Wrote|266
3|10.2.2 The Right to the City|268
3|10.2.3 The Brazilian integration of Social Function Doctrine and the Right to the City|269
3|10.2.4 The City Statute|269
2|10.3 Brazilian Cases|273
2|10.4 Conclusion|275
2|References|276
1|11 Léon Duguit and the Social Function of Property in Argentina|277
2|11.1 Precursors|278
2|11.2 The Argentine Constitution of 1949|281
3|11.2.1 Interventions on the Social Function of Property in the Constituent Convention|285
3|11.2.2 Argentine Legal Culture and Academic Commentary|288
2|11.3 Assessing Duguit’s Influence in Argentina|291
2|Appendix|293
2|References|294
1|The Importance of the Social Function of Property—North America|296
1|12 The Social Function of Property, Credit, and Capital in the United States|297
2|12.1 Introduction|297
2|12.2 Duguit’s Social Function Theory in the United States|301
3|12.2.1 Through Common Interest Communities|301
3|12.2.2 Through Consumer Financial Protection|304
3|12.2.3 Through Civil Rights|309
2|12.3 Conclusion|313
2|References|314
1|13 Duguit Appropriated: Trusts and Collective Ownership in Québec|318
2|13.1 Introduction|319
2|13.2 Duguit Now|320
2|13.3 Affectation Now|324
2|13.4 Appropriating Duguit; Affecting Civil Law|330
2|References|332
1|The Importance of the Social Function of Property—Australia, Africa and Asia|335
1|14 The Norm of Property’s Social Function: A Chinese Perspective|336
2|14.1 Introduction|336
2|14.2 The Constitutional Property Clause in China|339
2|14.3 The Role of Social Capital in the Chinese Homeowner Associations’ Governance|342
3|14.3.1 Social Capital as a Facilitating Factor|343
3|14.3.2 HOAs in China|343
2|14.4 Designing a Land Registration System for the Emerging Rural Land Market in China|346
2|14.5 Fair Use in Chinese Copyright Law|349
3|14.5.1 Private Use|351
3|14.5.2 Libraries’ Exemptions and a Right to Lend|353
2|14.6 Conclusion|355
2|References|356
1|15 Can Social Property Survive Under Neoliberalism?: A View from Australia|360
2|15.1 The State and Obligations|361
2|15.2 Social Obligations in Property|364
2|15.3 Social Obligations Under Neoliberalism|366
2|15.4 Public Things and Social Obligations|371
2|15.5 Conclusion|373
2|References|373
1|16 Between Custom and Colony: Social-Norm Based Property Law in South Africa’s Post-constitutional “no-Man’s Land”|376
2|16.1 Introduction|377
2|16.2 Teaching Property Law in South Africa After #RhodesMustFall|379
3|16.2.1 The Spectres of Colonization and Apartheid|381
3|16.2.2 Eurocentricism and the Current Nature of South African Law|386
2|16.3 Next Generation Learning: Property Law, the Social Norm and the “Evil Triplets”|390
3|16.3.1 Hand-to-Hand Transfers|392
3|16.3.2 Backyard Shacking|393
2|16.4 The Doctrinal no-Man’s Land Ahead|395
2|16.5 Conclusion|399
2|References|399
1|Afterword: Property’s Form and Function|408
2|From Formal to Functional|410
2|The Social Contextuality of Property|413
2|Diversity in Implementing the Social Function|415
2|Constitutional Property|417
2|Conclusion|418
2|References|419
1|Index|421
1|Acknowledgements|9
1|Translator’s Note|11
1|Contents|15
1|Editors and Contributors|17
1|1 Léon Duguit and the Propriété Function Sociale|19
2|1.1 Legal Realism, Social Relations, and Progressive Property|20
2|1.2 Léon Duguit|27
3|1.2.1 Biography|27
3|1.2.2 The Sixth Buenos Aires Lecture|30
2|1.3 Implications for Property|32
3|1.3.1 Concept|32
3|1.3.2 Law|34
2|1.4 Overview of the Book|39
3|1.4.1 Europe|40
3|1.4.2 South America|42
3|1.4.3 North America|44
3|1.4.4 Asia, Africa, and Australia|45
2|References|46
1|2 Translation|52
1|The Importance of the Social Function of Property—Europe|79
1|3 The Importance of the Social Function of Property—France|80
2|3.1 The Socialization of Private Property by the Law|82
3|3.1.1 The Rural and Commercial Properties Put into Service of Economic Exploitation and Environment|83
3|3.1.2 The Urban Property Put into Service of Housing in Harmonious Cities|85
2|3.2 The Doctrinal Reception of the Social Function of Property|89
3|3.2.1 The Expansion Phase|89
3|3.2.2 The Recoil Phase|93
2|References|98
1|4 Duguit and the German Property Law Tradition|102
2|4.1 Introduction|102
2|4.2 Duguit’s Theories in the Soviet Union|104
2|4.3 Duguit’s Theories in Early 20th Century Germany|104
2|4.4 Recognition in German Jurisprudence of the Social and Environmental Context of Property|109
3|4.4.1 Sociological Perspective|109
3|4.4.2 Historical Tradition|110
3|4.4.3 Modern Natural Law|110
2|4.5 Conclusion|121
2|References|122
1|5 The “Social Function of Property” in German Law|125
2|5.1 Concept of Ownership in the 19th Century|125
3|5.1.1 Constitutional-Historical Background|125
3|5.1.2 The Pandectist Conception of Property|126
2|5.2 New Trends: “Der Zweck im Recht” (Ihering)|127
3|5.2.1 Interests of Society Versus Individual Interests|127
3|5.2.2 Changes in the Concept of Property|128
3|5.2.3 Ihering and Duguit|128
2|5.3 Changes in the Concept of Property in Germany|129
3|5.3.1 The Great War as Catalyst|129
3|5.3.2 Shifting the Constitutional Frame|130
2|5.4 Excursus: (No) Reception of Duguit in Germany|132
2|5.5 Social Conditions of Property Rights Under Applicable Law|133
2|References|134
1|6 The Importance of the Social Function of Property—Norway|136
2|6.1 Introduction|136
2|6.2 Legal Precedent|140
2|6.3 Public Law—Legal Standards|143
2|6.4 Private Law—Legal Standards|146
2|6.5 Present Day Situation—Conclusion|152
2|References|154
1|7 The Social Function of Property: Russia|156
2|7.1 Introduction|156
2|7.2 Private Property-Public Ownership and the Commons|159
2|7.3 Revolutionary Communism (1917–1921): The Choice for the Proletarians|162
2|7.4 The Russian Mir, Obshchina or Agrarian Community|164
2|7.5 Soviet Socialist State Property|167
2|7.6 The Patrimonial Features of Power|171
2|7.7 Perestroika and Patrimonialism|172
2|7.8 Towards a New Functionality of Ownership?|176
2|7.9 Conclusion|178
2|References|178
1|The Importance of the Social Function of Property—South America|181
1|8 Liberalism and Property in Colombia: Property as a Right and Property as a Social Function|182
2|8.1 Introduction|182
2|8.2 The Classical Liberal Property System|187
2|8.3 The Mixed System of Property: Classical Liberalism and Interventionist Liberalism|195
2|8.4 The Liberal Interventionist Property System (1991–2011)|205
2|8.5 Conclusion|214
2|References|214
1|9 Tierra y Libertad: The Social Function Doctrine and Land Reform in Latin America|217
2|9.1 Introduction|218
2|9.2 Land Reform: The Legal-Historical and Sociopolitical Context|219
3|9.2.1 Roman Origins|220
3|9.2.2 Land Reform in Latin America: Historical Origins of Land Concentration|223
2|9.3 The Social Function Doctrine as the Legal Basis for Land Reform|231
3|9.3.1 Competing Perspectives on the Role of Property in Human Social Organization|232
3|9.3.2 Application of the Social Function Doctrine to Land Reform in Latin America|239
2|9.4 Recent Developments and Challenges to the Social Function Doctrine|246
3|9.4.1 The International Human Rights Dimension of the Social Function Doctrine|246
3|9.4.2 Accommodating “Sustainable Development”: Ecological Possession and the “Socio-environmental Function” of Land|249
3|9.4.3 Challenges to the Doctrine from the Trade Regime: Social Function and Regulatory Expropriation|251
3|9.4.4 The Social Function Doctrine in the Neoliberal Era|252
2|9.5 Conclusion|255
2|References|256
1|10 A Curious Doctrinal Marriage: the Social Function of Property and the Right to the City in Brazil|263
2|10.1 Social Function in Brazil|264
2|10.2 Social Function and the Right to the City|266
3|10.2.1 Context in Which Duguit Wrote|266
3|10.2.2 The Right to the City|268
3|10.2.3 The Brazilian integration of Social Function Doctrine and the Right to the City|269
3|10.2.4 The City Statute|269
2|10.3 Brazilian Cases|273
2|10.4 Conclusion|275
2|References|276
1|11 Léon Duguit and the Social Function of Property in Argentina|277
2|11.1 Precursors|278
2|11.2 The Argentine Constitution of 1949|281
3|11.2.1 Interventions on the Social Function of Property in the Constituent Convention|285
3|11.2.2 Argentine Legal Culture and Academic Commentary|288
2|11.3 Assessing Duguit’s Influence in Argentina|291
2|Appendix|293
2|References|294
1|The Importance of the Social Function of Property—North America|296
1|12 The Social Function of Property, Credit, and Capital in the United States|297
2|12.1 Introduction|297
2|12.2 Duguit’s Social Function Theory in the United States|301
3|12.2.1 Through Common Interest Communities|301
3|12.2.2 Through Consumer Financial Protection|304
3|12.2.3 Through Civil Rights|309
2|12.3 Conclusion|313
2|References|314
1|13 Duguit Appropriated: Trusts and Collective Ownership in Québec|318
2|13.1 Introduction|319
2|13.2 Duguit Now|320
2|13.3 Affectation Now|324
2|13.4 Appropriating Duguit; Affecting Civil Law|330
2|References|332
1|The Importance of the Social Function of Property—Australia, Africa and Asia|335
1|14 The Norm of Property’s Social Function: A Chinese Perspective|336
2|14.1 Introduction|336
2|14.2 The Constitutional Property Clause in China|339
2|14.3 The Role of Social Capital in the Chinese Homeowner Associations’ Governance|342
3|14.3.1 Social Capital as a Facilitating Factor|343
3|14.3.2 HOAs in China|343
2|14.4 Designing a Land Registration System for the Emerging Rural Land Market in China|346
2|14.5 Fair Use in Chinese Copyright Law|349
3|14.5.1 Private Use|351
3|14.5.2 Libraries’ Exemptions and a Right to Lend|353
2|14.6 Conclusion|355
2|References|356
1|15 Can Social Property Survive Under Neoliberalism?: A View from Australia|360
2|15.1 The State and Obligations|361
2|15.2 Social Obligations in Property|364
2|15.3 Social Obligations Under Neoliberalism|366
2|15.4 Public Things and Social Obligations|371
2|15.5 Conclusion|373
2|References|373
1|16 Between Custom and Colony: Social-Norm Based Property Law in South Africa’s Post-constitutional “no-Man’s Land”|376
2|16.1 Introduction|377
2|16.2 Teaching Property Law in South Africa After #RhodesMustFall|379
3|16.2.1 The Spectres of Colonization and Apartheid|381
3|16.2.2 Eurocentricism and the Current Nature of South African Law|386
2|16.3 Next Generation Learning: Property Law, the Social Norm and the “Evil Triplets”|390
3|16.3.1 Hand-to-Hand Transfers|392
3|16.3.2 Backyard Shacking|393
2|16.4 The Doctrinal no-Man’s Land Ahead|395
2|16.5 Conclusion|399
2|References|399
1|Afterword: Property’s Form and Function|408
2|From Formal to Functional|410
2|The Social Contextuality of Property|413
2|Diversity in Implementing the Social Function|415
2|Constitutional Property|417
2|Conclusion|418
2|References|419
1|Index|421