File #2280: "2018_Book_GlobalConstitutionalism.pdf"
Testo
1|Acknowledgments|6
1|Contents|8
1|1 Introduction|12
1|2 International Law, Globalization, and Transformation|17
2|2.1 International Law and Globalization|17
3|2.1.1 Globalization, Sovereignty and Changing Structures|19
4|2.1.1.1 Rise of Network Society|20
4|2.1.1.2 Erosion of Sovereignty|25
3|2.1.2 Challenges of Globalization towards International Law|30
4|2.1.2.1 Dimension of Transformation: From Westphalian towards Post-Westphalian|30
5|2.1.2.1.1 New Law for a New World|30
5|2.1.2.1.2 From “Law of Cooperation” towards “Law of Integration”|33
4|2.1.2.2 Expansion of International Community|39
5|2.1.2.2.1 International Organizations and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)|39
5|2.1.2.2.2 Individuals and Impact of Human Rights|45
4|2.1.2.3 A New Normative Framework|48
4|2.1.2.4 Fragmentation and International Law|53
5|2.1.2.4.1 Increasing Differentiation and Fragmentation|53
5|2.1.2.4.2 New Spaces, Regimes and Jurisdictional Rules|57
4|2.1.2.5 Blurring Borderline Between Public and Private Law|59
4|2.1.2.6 Paradigm Shifts|61
5|2.1.2.6.1 Earlier Shifts: International Community|62
5|2.1.2.6.2 Post-War Shifts|65
2|2.2 Responses to the Transformation: An Inquiry for a New Paradigm?|68
3|2.2.1 The Rise of the Idea of Global Law|69
3|2.2.2 Global Law and Constructivism|72
3|2.2.3 A Global Public Order? A Genealogy of Pluralism, Administrative Law and Constitutionalism|74
4|2.2.3.1 Global Legal Pluralism|75
4|2.2.3.2 Global Administrative Law|76
4|2.2.3.3 Global Constitutionalism|79
1|3 Constitutionalism in Global Context: A Developing Discourse|83
2|3.1 Mapping Global Constitutionalism Theories|84
3|3.1.1 Global Constitutionalist Theories: Assumption of an Ongoing Constitutionalization Process|85
4|3.1.1.1 Holistic Approaches: World State, Cosmopolitanism, Universalism|85
5|3.1.1.1.1 Cosmopolitanism and “the World State”|85
6|3.1.1.1.1.1 Kantian Tradition and Cosmopolitanism|86
6|3.1.1.1.1.2 The Idea of “World State”|91
5|3.1.1.1.2 The UN Charter as a Constitution|96
5|3.1.1.1.3 Constitutionalization of the WTO|101
4|3.1.1.2 Micro-Constitutionalization|104
5|3.1.1.2.1 World Society and Constitutions as Structural Couplings of Law and Politics|104
5|3.1.1.2.2 Teubner and Fischer-Lescano: Constitutional Fragments|108
4|3.1.1.3 Compensatory Constitutionalism|113
3|3.1.2 Global Constitutionalism as a “Noetic” Idea|116
2|3.2 Viability of Global Constitutionalism|118
3|3.2.1 Responses and Challenges to Global Constitutionalism|119
4|3.2.1.1 “Unrealistic” Perspective of Global Constitutionalism|119
4|3.2.1.2 “Flaws” of Global Constitutionalism|121
3|3.2.2 Interrogation for Viability of Global Constitutionalism|125
4|3.2.2.1 Commonalities of Global Constitutionalism Theories|125
4|3.2.2.2 What Does the Global Constitutionalism Discourse Lack?|126
1|4 Meaning of Contemporary Constitution|131
2|4.1 Key Concepts|131
3|4.1.1 The Main Idea of Contemporary Constitution and Constitutionalism|131
4|4.1.1.1 Historical Development of Modern Constitution and Constitutionalism|137
5|4.1.1.1.1 Pre-modern Developments|137
5|4.1.1.1.2 Rise of Modern Constitutionalism|142
4|4.1.1.2 Identification of Constitution: Discursive Facts|146
5|4.1.1.2.1 Traditional Idea of Constitution: Analytical Interpretation of Constitution|148
5|4.1.1.2.2 Constitutions in Context: The Dichotomy of Political Constitution and Legal Constitution|152
6|4.1.1.2.2.1 Legal Constitution|155
6|4.1.1.2.2.1.1 Theoretical Background|155
6|4.1.1.2.2.1.2 German Basic Law (Grundgesetz) as a Legal Constitution|160
6|4.1.1.2.2.2 Political Constitution|163
6|4.1.1.2.2.2.1 Theoretical Background|163
6|4.1.1.2.2.2.2 The Human Rights Act and the British Constitution|171
6|4.1.1.2.2.3 Contextual Identity of Constitution|176
2|4.2 Contemporary Constitutionalism and Globalization|182
3|4.2.1 Relationship and Communication Between Constitutions|182
4|4.2.1.1 Migration of Constitutions and Contemporary Constitution as a Mobile Phenomenon|182
4|4.2.1.2 Contemporary Constitution and Transconstitutionalism|188
3|4.2.2 Changing Framework of Legitimacy|191
4|4.2.2.1 Transformation of Constituent Power|191
4|4.2.2.2 Contemporary Constitution as Increasingly a Rights-based Concept|195
3|4.2.3 Contemporary Constitutionalism and Integration|196
4|4.2.3.1 Integrative Power of Modern Constitutions|196
4|4.2.3.2 Changing Face of Integrative Function|199
3|4.2.4 Meaning of Contemporary Constitution|204
4|4.2.4.1 A Deviation or a Continuance of Modern Constitution?|204
4|4.2.4.2 Typology Problem|205
4|4.2.4.3 A New Paradigm to Explain Diversity and Relativity of Constitutions|208
1|5 Contemporary Constitution and the Cultural Paradigm|218
2|5.1 Constitution as a Cultural Phenomenon|218
3|5.1.1 Cultural Paradigm and the Concept of Constitutional Culture|218
3|5.1.2 Constitutional Culture as a Reflection of Political and Civic Culture|221
4|5.1.2.1 Constitutional Culture as a Political Culture|221
4|5.1.2.2 Constitutional Cultures Between Political Decisions and Social Discourses: Theory of Richard Münch|225
3|5.1.3 Constitutional Culture as a Variation of Legal Culture|227
4|5.1.3.1 The Idea of Legal Culture|227
4|5.1.3.2 Constitutional Culture as Legal Culture|232
2|5.2 Reflections on Constitutional Culture|237
3|5.2.1 Constitutional Cultures in Territorial Basis|237
4|5.2.1.1 The British Constitutional Culture|238
4|5.2.1.2 The German Constitutional Culture|240
4|5.2.1.3 The American Constitutional Culture|242
3|5.2.2 Constitutional Culture in Context: Case of Human Rights|244
3|5.2.3 Cultural Identity of Constitution|249
1|6 Contemporary Constitutionalism to Understand Global Constitutionalism|252
2|6.1 Global Constitutionalism and the Narrower Meaning of Constitution|252
3|6.1.1 Global Constitutionalism from the Point of ‘Achieved Constitutions of the Past’|252
3|6.1.2 Some Further Aspects of Modern Constitutionalism: Integration, Unity, Separation of Powers|255
3|6.1.3 Fragmented Global Order: A Proto-Constitutional Order?|259
2|6.2 Global Constitutionalism from the Point of the Cultural Paradigm|260
3|6.2.1 Prospects for a Global Constitutional Culture|261
4|6.2.1.1 Global Constitutional Culture as a Global Legal Culture|262
5|6.2.1.1.1 Global Internal Legal Culture|263
5|6.2.1.1.2 Global External Legal Culture|268
4|6.2.1.2 Global Constitutional Culture as a Global Political Culture|277
5|6.2.1.2.1 Post-Westphalian Values and Consensus|278
5|6.2.1.2.2 Global Constitutional Culture and Legitimacy|283
5|6.2.1.2.3 A Global Rule of Law?|284
3|6.2.2 Global Constitutionalism and Constitutional Culture|290
2|6.3 Prospects for the Future of Global Constitutionalism|293
3|6.3.1 Global Constitutionalism as a Matter of Transconstitutional Relations|294
3|6.3.2 Global Constitution as a Metonym|298
1|7 Conclusion|302
1|Bibliography|307
1|Contents|8
1|1 Introduction|12
1|2 International Law, Globalization, and Transformation|17
2|2.1 International Law and Globalization|17
3|2.1.1 Globalization, Sovereignty and Changing Structures|19
4|2.1.1.1 Rise of Network Society|20
4|2.1.1.2 Erosion of Sovereignty|25
3|2.1.2 Challenges of Globalization towards International Law|30
4|2.1.2.1 Dimension of Transformation: From Westphalian towards Post-Westphalian|30
5|2.1.2.1.1 New Law for a New World|30
5|2.1.2.1.2 From “Law of Cooperation” towards “Law of Integration”|33
4|2.1.2.2 Expansion of International Community|39
5|2.1.2.2.1 International Organizations and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)|39
5|2.1.2.2.2 Individuals and Impact of Human Rights|45
4|2.1.2.3 A New Normative Framework|48
4|2.1.2.4 Fragmentation and International Law|53
5|2.1.2.4.1 Increasing Differentiation and Fragmentation|53
5|2.1.2.4.2 New Spaces, Regimes and Jurisdictional Rules|57
4|2.1.2.5 Blurring Borderline Between Public and Private Law|59
4|2.1.2.6 Paradigm Shifts|61
5|2.1.2.6.1 Earlier Shifts: International Community|62
5|2.1.2.6.2 Post-War Shifts|65
2|2.2 Responses to the Transformation: An Inquiry for a New Paradigm?|68
3|2.2.1 The Rise of the Idea of Global Law|69
3|2.2.2 Global Law and Constructivism|72
3|2.2.3 A Global Public Order? A Genealogy of Pluralism, Administrative Law and Constitutionalism|74
4|2.2.3.1 Global Legal Pluralism|75
4|2.2.3.2 Global Administrative Law|76
4|2.2.3.3 Global Constitutionalism|79
1|3 Constitutionalism in Global Context: A Developing Discourse|83
2|3.1 Mapping Global Constitutionalism Theories|84
3|3.1.1 Global Constitutionalist Theories: Assumption of an Ongoing Constitutionalization Process|85
4|3.1.1.1 Holistic Approaches: World State, Cosmopolitanism, Universalism|85
5|3.1.1.1.1 Cosmopolitanism and “the World State”|85
6|3.1.1.1.1.1 Kantian Tradition and Cosmopolitanism|86
6|3.1.1.1.1.2 The Idea of “World State”|91
5|3.1.1.1.2 The UN Charter as a Constitution|96
5|3.1.1.1.3 Constitutionalization of the WTO|101
4|3.1.1.2 Micro-Constitutionalization|104
5|3.1.1.2.1 World Society and Constitutions as Structural Couplings of Law and Politics|104
5|3.1.1.2.2 Teubner and Fischer-Lescano: Constitutional Fragments|108
4|3.1.1.3 Compensatory Constitutionalism|113
3|3.1.2 Global Constitutionalism as a “Noetic” Idea|116
2|3.2 Viability of Global Constitutionalism|118
3|3.2.1 Responses and Challenges to Global Constitutionalism|119
4|3.2.1.1 “Unrealistic” Perspective of Global Constitutionalism|119
4|3.2.1.2 “Flaws” of Global Constitutionalism|121
3|3.2.2 Interrogation for Viability of Global Constitutionalism|125
4|3.2.2.1 Commonalities of Global Constitutionalism Theories|125
4|3.2.2.2 What Does the Global Constitutionalism Discourse Lack?|126
1|4 Meaning of Contemporary Constitution|131
2|4.1 Key Concepts|131
3|4.1.1 The Main Idea of Contemporary Constitution and Constitutionalism|131
4|4.1.1.1 Historical Development of Modern Constitution and Constitutionalism|137
5|4.1.1.1.1 Pre-modern Developments|137
5|4.1.1.1.2 Rise of Modern Constitutionalism|142
4|4.1.1.2 Identification of Constitution: Discursive Facts|146
5|4.1.1.2.1 Traditional Idea of Constitution: Analytical Interpretation of Constitution|148
5|4.1.1.2.2 Constitutions in Context: The Dichotomy of Political Constitution and Legal Constitution|152
6|4.1.1.2.2.1 Legal Constitution|155
6|4.1.1.2.2.1.1 Theoretical Background|155
6|4.1.1.2.2.1.2 German Basic Law (Grundgesetz) as a Legal Constitution|160
6|4.1.1.2.2.2 Political Constitution|163
6|4.1.1.2.2.2.1 Theoretical Background|163
6|4.1.1.2.2.2.2 The Human Rights Act and the British Constitution|171
6|4.1.1.2.2.3 Contextual Identity of Constitution|176
2|4.2 Contemporary Constitutionalism and Globalization|182
3|4.2.1 Relationship and Communication Between Constitutions|182
4|4.2.1.1 Migration of Constitutions and Contemporary Constitution as a Mobile Phenomenon|182
4|4.2.1.2 Contemporary Constitution and Transconstitutionalism|188
3|4.2.2 Changing Framework of Legitimacy|191
4|4.2.2.1 Transformation of Constituent Power|191
4|4.2.2.2 Contemporary Constitution as Increasingly a Rights-based Concept|195
3|4.2.3 Contemporary Constitutionalism and Integration|196
4|4.2.3.1 Integrative Power of Modern Constitutions|196
4|4.2.3.2 Changing Face of Integrative Function|199
3|4.2.4 Meaning of Contemporary Constitution|204
4|4.2.4.1 A Deviation or a Continuance of Modern Constitution?|204
4|4.2.4.2 Typology Problem|205
4|4.2.4.3 A New Paradigm to Explain Diversity and Relativity of Constitutions|208
1|5 Contemporary Constitution and the Cultural Paradigm|218
2|5.1 Constitution as a Cultural Phenomenon|218
3|5.1.1 Cultural Paradigm and the Concept of Constitutional Culture|218
3|5.1.2 Constitutional Culture as a Reflection of Political and Civic Culture|221
4|5.1.2.1 Constitutional Culture as a Political Culture|221
4|5.1.2.2 Constitutional Cultures Between Political Decisions and Social Discourses: Theory of Richard Münch|225
3|5.1.3 Constitutional Culture as a Variation of Legal Culture|227
4|5.1.3.1 The Idea of Legal Culture|227
4|5.1.3.2 Constitutional Culture as Legal Culture|232
2|5.2 Reflections on Constitutional Culture|237
3|5.2.1 Constitutional Cultures in Territorial Basis|237
4|5.2.1.1 The British Constitutional Culture|238
4|5.2.1.2 The German Constitutional Culture|240
4|5.2.1.3 The American Constitutional Culture|242
3|5.2.2 Constitutional Culture in Context: Case of Human Rights|244
3|5.2.3 Cultural Identity of Constitution|249
1|6 Contemporary Constitutionalism to Understand Global Constitutionalism|252
2|6.1 Global Constitutionalism and the Narrower Meaning of Constitution|252
3|6.1.1 Global Constitutionalism from the Point of ‘Achieved Constitutions of the Past’|252
3|6.1.2 Some Further Aspects of Modern Constitutionalism: Integration, Unity, Separation of Powers|255
3|6.1.3 Fragmented Global Order: A Proto-Constitutional Order?|259
2|6.2 Global Constitutionalism from the Point of the Cultural Paradigm|260
3|6.2.1 Prospects for a Global Constitutional Culture|261
4|6.2.1.1 Global Constitutional Culture as a Global Legal Culture|262
5|6.2.1.1.1 Global Internal Legal Culture|263
5|6.2.1.1.2 Global External Legal Culture|268
4|6.2.1.2 Global Constitutional Culture as a Global Political Culture|277
5|6.2.1.2.1 Post-Westphalian Values and Consensus|278
5|6.2.1.2.2 Global Constitutional Culture and Legitimacy|283
5|6.2.1.2.3 A Global Rule of Law?|284
3|6.2.2 Global Constitutionalism and Constitutional Culture|290
2|6.3 Prospects for the Future of Global Constitutionalism|293
3|6.3.1 Global Constitutionalism as a Matter of Transconstitutional Relations|294
3|6.3.2 Global Constitution as a Metonym|298
1|7 Conclusion|302
1|Bibliography|307