File #2382: "2018_Book_InstitutionalisationBeyondTheN.pdf"
Testo
1|Foreword|6
2|References|9
1|Preface|10
1|Contents|11
1|List of Contributors|13
1|Introduction: Institutionalisation beyond the Nation State: New Paradigms? Transatlantic Relations: Data, Privacy and Trade Law|15
2|1 Overview|15
3|1.1 On Method|18
3|1.2 The Focus of This Book on Institutionalisation: Developing a Research Agenda|20
2|2 Transatlantic Relations and (Non-) Institutionalisation|22
3|2.1 Overview|22
3|2.2 Integration Through Dialogues|23
3|2.3 A Transatlantic Civil Society?|24
2|3 Institutionalisation and TTIP: Lessons from the Regulatory Cooperation Chapter Negotiations|25
2|4 Institutionalisation: The EU´s Proposal for a Multilateral Investment Court: TTIP, CETA and Beyond|27
2|5 Institutionalisation Attempts in EU-US Data Flows, Transparency and Privacy: Lessons to Be Learned?|30
3|5.1 Overview|30
3|5.2 EU-US Safe Harbour to the EU-US Privacy Shield|30
3|5.3 EU-US Privacy Shield|32
3|5.4 EU-US Umbrella Agreement|33
2|6 Outline of Chapters|34
2|7 Conclusions|37
2|References|38
1|Part I: Transatlantic Data, Information and Privacy|42
2|The European Parliament and Transatlantic Relations: Personal Reflections|43
3|1 Overview|43
3|2 The Role of the European Parliament in Transatlantic Cooperation|44
3|3 Transatlantic Cooperation in the Justice and Home Affairs and the Role of the LIBE Committee|45
3|4 Passenger Name Record (PNR) Data Transfer|46
3|5 Data Protection|47
3|6 Data Protection Reform (New Package)|48
3|7 Privacy Shield/Safe Harbour|49
3|8 Umbrella Agreement|49
3|9 Conclusion|50
2|Transparency in the Institutionalisation of Transatlantic Relations: Dynamics of Official Secrets and Access to Information in...|51
3|1 Introduction|51
3|2 Institutionalisation and Transparency|53
3|3 Official Secrets in Transatlantic Relations: From Customary Norms in Security to a Comprehensive Policy|55
3|4 Limitations on Access to Information in Security and Trade|58
4|4.1 The Terrorist Finance Tracking Programme: Changing the Boundaries of Transparency in the EU´s External Relations|58
4|4.2 Negotiations of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership|60
3|5 Increased Transparency? Paradoxes and Implications of Institutionalisation|62
3|6 Conclusions|63
3|References|64
2|The EU-US Data Privacy and Counterterrorism Agreements: What Lessons for Transatlantic Institutionalisation?|67
3|1 Introduction|67
3|2 The EU and US Data Privacy Regimes|70
3|3 The Institutionalisation Dynamics of the Transatlantic Data Transfer Agreements in the Field of Counterterrorism: Rules, Pro...|73
4|3.1 The EU-US Agreements|73
5|3.1.1 The EU-US PNR Agreements|73
5|3.1.2 The EU-US TFTP Agreements|74
5|3.1.3 The EU-US Privacy Shield|75
5|3.1.4 The EU-US Umbrella Agreement|76
4|3.2 Transatlantic Data Privacy Cooperation: Institutional Dynamics, Structure and Substance|77
5|3.2.1 Institutional Dynamics|77
5|3.2.2 Structure and Form|79
4|3.3 The Substantive Provisions|80
3|4 Taking Back Control? A Return to Sovereignty and De-institutionalisation as Potential Solutions?|82
3|5 Concluding Remarks: The Lessons Learned from the Transatlantic Data Privacy Experience|84
3|References|84
2|The Max Schrems Litigation: A Personal Account|87
3|1 Overview|87
3|2 Privacy as a Highly Cultural Issue|88
3|3 Personal Story|88
3|4 The Genesis of His Legal Arguments|89
3|5 A Strategic Approach to the Litigation|89
3|6 What Legal Sources to Deploy|90
3|7 On Data Pulling as Interference|90
3|8 The Safe Harbour Agreement|91
3|9 Procedure|92
3|10 The European Court of Justice|93
3|11 Findings by the European Court of Justice|93
3|12 How to Bridge the Gap After the European Court of Justice Invalidated Safe Harbour|95
3|13 Privacy Shield|96
3|14 Private Sector Redress|97
3|15 Surveillance Assessment|98
3|16 Enforcement|99
3|17 Class Action|100
2|Epilogue Debate: Transatlantic Data Flow-Which Kind of Institutionalisation?|102
3|References|105
1|Part II: Transatlantic Institutionalisation Trade and Regulation|106
2|Who Recognises Technical Standards in TTIP?|107
3|1 Introduction|107
3|2 The `Legal´, Factual and Methodological Framework for Investigating Technical Standard Setting in TTIP: Why Institutional Qu...|108
3|3 Technical Standards in TTIP: An Overview|110
4|3.1 What Is a Technical Standard According to TBT TTIPleak?|110
4|3.2 The Treatment of Technical Standards in TBT TTIPleak|112
4|3.3 The EU Approach: Cooperation of Private Standard Setters and a Public Framework|114
4|3.4 US: Procedural Approach|115
4|3.5 Reasons for the Difference|115
3|4 Comparison and Conclusion|116
3|References|118
2|Institutionalising Transatlantic Business: Financial Services Regulation in TTIP|120
3|1 Introduction|120
3|2 Post-crisis World of Finance|123
3|3 Financial Services in TTIP|125
3|4 Institutionalisation of Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation in Finance|126
4|4.1 Objectives and Methods|126
4|4.2 Joint EU-US Financial Regulatory Forum|127
3|5 Stakeholders as Institutional Actors|130
3|6 Concluding Remarks|131
3|References|133
2|Something Borrowed, Something New: The TTIP Investment Court: How to Fit Old Procedures into New Institutional Design|137
3|1 Introduction|137
3|2 Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement: A History of Failed Attempts|140
4|2.1 The Historical Context|140
4|2.2 The Political Context|142
3|3 Main Features of the Investment Court System|145
4|3.1 Institutional Design|145
4|3.2 Procedural Innovations|146
3|4 Legal and Institutional Constraints for the ICS|149
4|4.1 International Legal Framework|149
4|4.2 EU Legal Framework|150
3|5 Transatlanticism: Yes, no, Maybe?|151
3|6 Conclusions|153
3|References|154
2|Procedural Multilateralism and Multilateral Investment Court: Discussion in Light of Increased Institutionalism in Transatlant...|156
3|1 Introduction|156
3|2 Procedural Multilateralism and the Mauritius Convention on Transparency|158
4|2.1 UNCITRAL´s Working Methods|158
4|2.2 The Content of the Mauritius Convention|159
4|2.3 Flexibility and Incremental Change Facilitate the Entry into Force and Expansion of the Convention|160
4|2.4 Multilateralism in International Tax Law and the OECD Tax Convention|161
4|2.5 Interim Concluding Remarks in Light of the Multilateral Investment Court|162
3|3 Multilateral Investment Court|163
4|3.1 The Design of the International Investment Court|163
4|3.2 The Shift from Bilateral Courts to a Single Multilateral Court|164
4|3.3 The EU´s 2017 Public Consultation and De Lege Ferenda Considerations|166
4|3.4 Relationship Between the Treaty Introducing the New Mechanism for IIAs and Existing Investment Agreements|168
3|4 Conclusions|170
3|References|171
2|Beyond the Shadow of the Veto: Economic Treaty Making in the European Union After Opinion 2/15|172
3|1 Introduction|172
3|2 Institutional Effectiveness and Veto Players in EU External Economic Governance|175
3|3 Competence and Procedure for Economic Treaty Making in the EU|177
4|3.1 From Rome to Nice: Exclusive External Competence for Common Commercial Policy Before the Lisbon Era|178
4|3.2 The Consolidation of Exclusive Competence for Common Commercial Policy Under the Treaty of Lisbon|179
4|3.3 Opinion 2/15: Litigating EU Exclusive Competence for External Economic Governance|181
4|3.4 The Implications of Opinion 2/15 for EU Economic Treaty Making|186
3|4 Assessment and Conclusions|188
3|References|189
1|Part III: Institutionalisation and Global Governance|191
2|Can Transatlantic Trade Relations Be Institutionalised After Trump? Prospects for EU-US Trade Governance in the Era of Antiglo...|192
3|1 Overview|192
3|2 Explaining the Populist Moment: Competing Plutocracies|193
3|3 Asymmetry in Transatlantic Economic Relationships|197
3|4 EU Trade Agreements and Transnational Institutionalisation|199
3|5 Populism, Globalisation, Trade and Trump|201
4|5.1 Trumpism as `Faux Populism´: The Trade File|205
4|5.2 The TTIP Agenda and the Trump Presidency|208
4|5.3 Transatlantic Ties: A Bilateral with the UK?|210
3|6 Conclusion|212
3|References|214
2|Building Global Governance One Treaty at a Time? A Comparison of the US and EU Approaches to Preferential Trade Agreements and...|217
3|1 Introduction|217
3|2 Background: Free Trade Agreements as Mechanism for the Formalisation of Trade Rules and Trade Governing Institutions|219
3|3 Transatlantic Competition to Formalise Trade Rules Through Free Trade Agreements|222
3|4 Key Similarities and Differences in US and EU FTAs|225
4|4.1 Similarities|225
4|4.2 Differences|227
4|4.3 Approaches to Regulatory Cooperation in the Most Recent Agreements|229
4|4.4 Approaches to Issues Not Covered in the WTO|231
3|5 TTIP Ambitions: A Treaty to Usher in Global Trade Rules|234
4|5.1 Overview|234
4|5.2 Regulatory Cooperation|235
4|5.3 Investor-State Disputes|241
3|6 Concluding Remarks|242
3|References|244
2|Federalism, State Cooperation and Compliance with International Commitments|247
3|1 Introduction|247
3|2 Divided Power and EU External Relations|248
3|3 Foreign Affairs and the US Constitution|249
3|4 State Cooperation in the Implementation and Enforcement of International Commitments|251
3|5 Conclusion|257
3|References|258
1|Part IV: Closing Remarks|261
2|Conclusions|262
3|Reference|266
2|References|9
1|Preface|10
1|Contents|11
1|List of Contributors|13
1|Introduction: Institutionalisation beyond the Nation State: New Paradigms? Transatlantic Relations: Data, Privacy and Trade Law|15
2|1 Overview|15
3|1.1 On Method|18
3|1.2 The Focus of This Book on Institutionalisation: Developing a Research Agenda|20
2|2 Transatlantic Relations and (Non-) Institutionalisation|22
3|2.1 Overview|22
3|2.2 Integration Through Dialogues|23
3|2.3 A Transatlantic Civil Society?|24
2|3 Institutionalisation and TTIP: Lessons from the Regulatory Cooperation Chapter Negotiations|25
2|4 Institutionalisation: The EU´s Proposal for a Multilateral Investment Court: TTIP, CETA and Beyond|27
2|5 Institutionalisation Attempts in EU-US Data Flows, Transparency and Privacy: Lessons to Be Learned?|30
3|5.1 Overview|30
3|5.2 EU-US Safe Harbour to the EU-US Privacy Shield|30
3|5.3 EU-US Privacy Shield|32
3|5.4 EU-US Umbrella Agreement|33
2|6 Outline of Chapters|34
2|7 Conclusions|37
2|References|38
1|Part I: Transatlantic Data, Information and Privacy|42
2|The European Parliament and Transatlantic Relations: Personal Reflections|43
3|1 Overview|43
3|2 The Role of the European Parliament in Transatlantic Cooperation|44
3|3 Transatlantic Cooperation in the Justice and Home Affairs and the Role of the LIBE Committee|45
3|4 Passenger Name Record (PNR) Data Transfer|46
3|5 Data Protection|47
3|6 Data Protection Reform (New Package)|48
3|7 Privacy Shield/Safe Harbour|49
3|8 Umbrella Agreement|49
3|9 Conclusion|50
2|Transparency in the Institutionalisation of Transatlantic Relations: Dynamics of Official Secrets and Access to Information in...|51
3|1 Introduction|51
3|2 Institutionalisation and Transparency|53
3|3 Official Secrets in Transatlantic Relations: From Customary Norms in Security to a Comprehensive Policy|55
3|4 Limitations on Access to Information in Security and Trade|58
4|4.1 The Terrorist Finance Tracking Programme: Changing the Boundaries of Transparency in the EU´s External Relations|58
4|4.2 Negotiations of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership|60
3|5 Increased Transparency? Paradoxes and Implications of Institutionalisation|62
3|6 Conclusions|63
3|References|64
2|The EU-US Data Privacy and Counterterrorism Agreements: What Lessons for Transatlantic Institutionalisation?|67
3|1 Introduction|67
3|2 The EU and US Data Privacy Regimes|70
3|3 The Institutionalisation Dynamics of the Transatlantic Data Transfer Agreements in the Field of Counterterrorism: Rules, Pro...|73
4|3.1 The EU-US Agreements|73
5|3.1.1 The EU-US PNR Agreements|73
5|3.1.2 The EU-US TFTP Agreements|74
5|3.1.3 The EU-US Privacy Shield|75
5|3.1.4 The EU-US Umbrella Agreement|76
4|3.2 Transatlantic Data Privacy Cooperation: Institutional Dynamics, Structure and Substance|77
5|3.2.1 Institutional Dynamics|77
5|3.2.2 Structure and Form|79
4|3.3 The Substantive Provisions|80
3|4 Taking Back Control? A Return to Sovereignty and De-institutionalisation as Potential Solutions?|82
3|5 Concluding Remarks: The Lessons Learned from the Transatlantic Data Privacy Experience|84
3|References|84
2|The Max Schrems Litigation: A Personal Account|87
3|1 Overview|87
3|2 Privacy as a Highly Cultural Issue|88
3|3 Personal Story|88
3|4 The Genesis of His Legal Arguments|89
3|5 A Strategic Approach to the Litigation|89
3|6 What Legal Sources to Deploy|90
3|7 On Data Pulling as Interference|90
3|8 The Safe Harbour Agreement|91
3|9 Procedure|92
3|10 The European Court of Justice|93
3|11 Findings by the European Court of Justice|93
3|12 How to Bridge the Gap After the European Court of Justice Invalidated Safe Harbour|95
3|13 Privacy Shield|96
3|14 Private Sector Redress|97
3|15 Surveillance Assessment|98
3|16 Enforcement|99
3|17 Class Action|100
2|Epilogue Debate: Transatlantic Data Flow-Which Kind of Institutionalisation?|102
3|References|105
1|Part II: Transatlantic Institutionalisation Trade and Regulation|106
2|Who Recognises Technical Standards in TTIP?|107
3|1 Introduction|107
3|2 The `Legal´, Factual and Methodological Framework for Investigating Technical Standard Setting in TTIP: Why Institutional Qu...|108
3|3 Technical Standards in TTIP: An Overview|110
4|3.1 What Is a Technical Standard According to TBT TTIPleak?|110
4|3.2 The Treatment of Technical Standards in TBT TTIPleak|112
4|3.3 The EU Approach: Cooperation of Private Standard Setters and a Public Framework|114
4|3.4 US: Procedural Approach|115
4|3.5 Reasons for the Difference|115
3|4 Comparison and Conclusion|116
3|References|118
2|Institutionalising Transatlantic Business: Financial Services Regulation in TTIP|120
3|1 Introduction|120
3|2 Post-crisis World of Finance|123
3|3 Financial Services in TTIP|125
3|4 Institutionalisation of Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation in Finance|126
4|4.1 Objectives and Methods|126
4|4.2 Joint EU-US Financial Regulatory Forum|127
3|5 Stakeholders as Institutional Actors|130
3|6 Concluding Remarks|131
3|References|133
2|Something Borrowed, Something New: The TTIP Investment Court: How to Fit Old Procedures into New Institutional Design|137
3|1 Introduction|137
3|2 Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement: A History of Failed Attempts|140
4|2.1 The Historical Context|140
4|2.2 The Political Context|142
3|3 Main Features of the Investment Court System|145
4|3.1 Institutional Design|145
4|3.2 Procedural Innovations|146
3|4 Legal and Institutional Constraints for the ICS|149
4|4.1 International Legal Framework|149
4|4.2 EU Legal Framework|150
3|5 Transatlanticism: Yes, no, Maybe?|151
3|6 Conclusions|153
3|References|154
2|Procedural Multilateralism and Multilateral Investment Court: Discussion in Light of Increased Institutionalism in Transatlant...|156
3|1 Introduction|156
3|2 Procedural Multilateralism and the Mauritius Convention on Transparency|158
4|2.1 UNCITRAL´s Working Methods|158
4|2.2 The Content of the Mauritius Convention|159
4|2.3 Flexibility and Incremental Change Facilitate the Entry into Force and Expansion of the Convention|160
4|2.4 Multilateralism in International Tax Law and the OECD Tax Convention|161
4|2.5 Interim Concluding Remarks in Light of the Multilateral Investment Court|162
3|3 Multilateral Investment Court|163
4|3.1 The Design of the International Investment Court|163
4|3.2 The Shift from Bilateral Courts to a Single Multilateral Court|164
4|3.3 The EU´s 2017 Public Consultation and De Lege Ferenda Considerations|166
4|3.4 Relationship Between the Treaty Introducing the New Mechanism for IIAs and Existing Investment Agreements|168
3|4 Conclusions|170
3|References|171
2|Beyond the Shadow of the Veto: Economic Treaty Making in the European Union After Opinion 2/15|172
3|1 Introduction|172
3|2 Institutional Effectiveness and Veto Players in EU External Economic Governance|175
3|3 Competence and Procedure for Economic Treaty Making in the EU|177
4|3.1 From Rome to Nice: Exclusive External Competence for Common Commercial Policy Before the Lisbon Era|178
4|3.2 The Consolidation of Exclusive Competence for Common Commercial Policy Under the Treaty of Lisbon|179
4|3.3 Opinion 2/15: Litigating EU Exclusive Competence for External Economic Governance|181
4|3.4 The Implications of Opinion 2/15 for EU Economic Treaty Making|186
3|4 Assessment and Conclusions|188
3|References|189
1|Part III: Institutionalisation and Global Governance|191
2|Can Transatlantic Trade Relations Be Institutionalised After Trump? Prospects for EU-US Trade Governance in the Era of Antiglo...|192
3|1 Overview|192
3|2 Explaining the Populist Moment: Competing Plutocracies|193
3|3 Asymmetry in Transatlantic Economic Relationships|197
3|4 EU Trade Agreements and Transnational Institutionalisation|199
3|5 Populism, Globalisation, Trade and Trump|201
4|5.1 Trumpism as `Faux Populism´: The Trade File|205
4|5.2 The TTIP Agenda and the Trump Presidency|208
4|5.3 Transatlantic Ties: A Bilateral with the UK?|210
3|6 Conclusion|212
3|References|214
2|Building Global Governance One Treaty at a Time? A Comparison of the US and EU Approaches to Preferential Trade Agreements and...|217
3|1 Introduction|217
3|2 Background: Free Trade Agreements as Mechanism for the Formalisation of Trade Rules and Trade Governing Institutions|219
3|3 Transatlantic Competition to Formalise Trade Rules Through Free Trade Agreements|222
3|4 Key Similarities and Differences in US and EU FTAs|225
4|4.1 Similarities|225
4|4.2 Differences|227
4|4.3 Approaches to Regulatory Cooperation in the Most Recent Agreements|229
4|4.4 Approaches to Issues Not Covered in the WTO|231
3|5 TTIP Ambitions: A Treaty to Usher in Global Trade Rules|234
4|5.1 Overview|234
4|5.2 Regulatory Cooperation|235
4|5.3 Investor-State Disputes|241
3|6 Concluding Remarks|242
3|References|244
2|Federalism, State Cooperation and Compliance with International Commitments|247
3|1 Introduction|247
3|2 Divided Power and EU External Relations|248
3|3 Foreign Affairs and the US Constitution|249
3|4 State Cooperation in the Implementation and Enforcement of International Commitments|251
3|5 Conclusion|257
3|References|258
1|Part IV: Closing Remarks|261
2|Conclusions|262
3|Reference|266