File #2493: "2018_Book_CognitionOfTheLaw.pdf"
Testo
1|Preface|5
1|Introduction|6
1|Contents|9
1|Chapter 1: The Social Subject as a Legal Actor|11
2|1.1 The Social Subject as a Legal Actor|11
2|1.2 The Connection Between Micro- and Macro-Theories|17
2|1.3 Rationality|21
2|1.4 Emotions and Justice|28
2|1.5 Toward an Empirical and Physicalist “Cognitive Sociology”|38
2|References|42
1|Chapter 2: The Psychic Subject as a Legal Actor|48
2|2.1 Law and Psychology|48
2|2.2 The Social Psychology of Law|53
2|2.3 Distributive Justice|58
2|2.4 Procedural Justice|67
2|2.5 Transgression, Conformism, and Aggression|73
2|2.6 The Criticisms Against Legal Psychology, and Why They Should Be Rejected|79
2|References|85
1|Chapter 3: Nature, Evolution, and Law|92
2|3.1 Sociological Theories of Human Behavior|92
2|3.2 The Paradox of Cooperation|98
2|3.3 Sociobiology and the Epigenetic Hypothesis|105
2|3.4 Evolutionary Analysis of Legal Attitudes|117
2|3.5 Criticism of the Biosocial Synthesis|127
2|References|135
1|Chapter 4: Cognition and the Law|144
2|4.1 The Brain, Cognitive Science, and Law|144
2|4.2 Neuroscientific Techniques Applied to the Law|150
2|4.3 Imitation, Mirroring, Empathy|157
2|4.4 Decisions, Heuristics, and Biases|163
2|4.5 The Endowment Effect and Equity Seeking|167
2|4.6 Anchoring, Confirmation, Hindsight, and Other Biases|173
2|4.7 Nudging|180
2|4.8 The Way Forward for Cognitive Law|188
2|References|191
1|Chapter 5: Conclusion|202
1|Introduction|6
1|Contents|9
1|Chapter 1: The Social Subject as a Legal Actor|11
2|1.1 The Social Subject as a Legal Actor|11
2|1.2 The Connection Between Micro- and Macro-Theories|17
2|1.3 Rationality|21
2|1.4 Emotions and Justice|28
2|1.5 Toward an Empirical and Physicalist “Cognitive Sociology”|38
2|References|42
1|Chapter 2: The Psychic Subject as a Legal Actor|48
2|2.1 Law and Psychology|48
2|2.2 The Social Psychology of Law|53
2|2.3 Distributive Justice|58
2|2.4 Procedural Justice|67
2|2.5 Transgression, Conformism, and Aggression|73
2|2.6 The Criticisms Against Legal Psychology, and Why They Should Be Rejected|79
2|References|85
1|Chapter 3: Nature, Evolution, and Law|92
2|3.1 Sociological Theories of Human Behavior|92
2|3.2 The Paradox of Cooperation|98
2|3.3 Sociobiology and the Epigenetic Hypothesis|105
2|3.4 Evolutionary Analysis of Legal Attitudes|117
2|3.5 Criticism of the Biosocial Synthesis|127
2|References|135
1|Chapter 4: Cognition and the Law|144
2|4.1 The Brain, Cognitive Science, and Law|144
2|4.2 Neuroscientific Techniques Applied to the Law|150
2|4.3 Imitation, Mirroring, Empathy|157
2|4.4 Decisions, Heuristics, and Biases|163
2|4.5 The Endowment Effect and Equity Seeking|167
2|4.6 Anchoring, Confirmation, Hindsight, and Other Biases|173
2|4.7 Nudging|180
2|4.8 The Way Forward for Cognitive Law|188
2|References|191
1|Chapter 5: Conclusion|202