File #2655: "2019_Book_ScholarshipPracticeAndEducatio.pdf"
Testo
1|Foreword|5
2|Mary Hiscock|5
2|Reference|7
1|Contents|8
1|Contributors|10
1|Chapter 1: Introduction: Comparative Dimensions of Law in Context|11
2|1.1 About Emeritus Professor Mary Hiscock|11
2|1.2 About the Book|14
2|References|14
1|Part I: Scholarship|15
2|Chapter 2: Recent Developments in Australian PPSA Case Law and Their Relevance to Other PPSA Jurisdictions|16
3|2.1 Introduction|17
3|2.2 Hamersley Iron|18
4|2.2.1 Case Overview|18
4|2.2.2 PPSA, section 338|21
4|2.2.3 PPSA, section 80(1) and Corporations Act, section 553C|23
4|2.2.4 Floating Charges and the PPSA|27
3|2.3 OneSteel|29
3|2.4 Samwise|33
4|2.4.1 Introduction|33
4|2.4.2 Case Overview|34
4|2.4.3 Analysis|36
4|2.4.4 The MacPhee Case|38
4|2.4.5 The CCPPSL Report|39
4|2.4.6 Advance Registration|40
4|2.4.7 Conclusion|41
3|2.5 Re Amerind|42
3|2.6 Conclusion|45
3|References|46
2|Chapter 3: A Return to That Other Country: Legal History as Comparative Law|48
3|3.1 Introduction|48
3|3.2 What Is Legal History?|49
3|3.3 What Is Comparative Law?|51
3|3.4 What Are the Techniques of Legal Historians?|52
3|3.5 What Are the Techniques of Comparative Lawyers?|54
3|3.6 What Are the Aims of Legal Historian and Comparatists?|56
3|3.7 Comparative Law and Legal History|56
3|3.8 Does It Matter?|59
3|3.9 A Salutary Tale|60
3|3.10 Conclusions|61
3|3.11 Envoi|61
3|References|62
2|Chapter 4: The Value of Comparative Law Approach in Treaty Interpretation|63
3|4.1 Introduction|64
3|4.2 The Situations under Which International Treaties Are Brought into the Context of Comparative Law Approach|65
4|4.2.1 International Treaties as a ‘Compared Norm’|65
4|4.2.2 Comparative Approach to Help Treaty Interpretation|66
3|4.3 Comparative Approach to Help Interpret Treaties Governing Private Relations|66
3|4.4 Comparative Approach to Help Interpret Treaties Governing States’ Relations or Behaviours|68
3|4.5 Comparative Approach to Help Identify the ‘Ordinary Meaning’ of a Treaty Term|68
4|4.5.1 Identifying the ‘Ordinary Meaning’ of a Treaty Term|68
4|4.5.2 Justification of Comparing Different Treaties to Help Identify the Ordinary Meaning of a Treaty Term|69
4|4.5.3 The Requirements for Applying the Comparative Approach to Help Identify the ‘Ordinary Meaning’|70
3|4.6 Comparative Law Approach Serving as a Supplementary Means of Treaty Interpretation|71
4|4.6.1 The Meaning and Scope of Supplementary Means of Treaty Interpretation|71
4|4.6.2 Other International Treaties as Part of Preparatory Work or the Circumstances of the Conclusion of an Interpreted Treaty|72
4|4.6.3 Separate Treaties as a Supplementary Means Other Than a Preparatory Work or the Circumstances of the Conclusion of an Interpreted Treaty|73
3|4.7 Some Concluding Remarks|74
3|References|74
2|Chapter 5: An Idea for a Better World: Human Rightsponsibility|76
3|5.1 Introduction|77
3|5.2 International Legal Order|78
3|5.3 Human Rights Movement|79
3|5.4 Human Rightsponsibility in Theory|81
3|5.5 Human Rightsponsibility in Action|85
3|5.6 Conclusion|86
3|References|87
2|Chapter 6: Financial Stability After the Global Financial Crisis: Globalisation, Nationalism and the Potential Demise of a Rules-Based Order|88
3|6.1 Introduction|88
3|6.2 Financial Stability – A Significant But Elusive Concept|90
4|6.2.1 ‘Finance’ and ‘Stability’|91
5|6.2.1.1 Finance Needs a Measure of Instability|91
5|6.2.1.2 Defining Stability by Its Opposite, Instability|92
5|6.2.1.3 Financial Stability and Equilibrium|93
5|6.2.1.4 Narrow and Broad Interpretations of ‘Financial Stability’|93
4|6.2.2 Regulating Financial Stability|94
3|6.3 Globalisation – A Paradigm|95
4|6.3.1 Globalisation Defined|95
4|6.3.2 Effects/Consequences of Globalisation|96
3|6.4 Globalisation and Financial Stability|97
4|6.4.1 Globalisation and Financial Markets|97
4|6.4.2 Globalisation’s Benefits for Financial Stability|98
4|6.4.3 Globalisation Undermining Financial Stability: Solutions to Financial Instability Become Causes of Financial Instability|100
5|6.4.3.1 The Unwinding of the Washington Consensus and a Globalisation Backlash|100
6|Bretton Woods|101
6|The Washington Consensus|102
5|6.4.3.2 The GFC and Its Aftermath|103
5|6.4.3.3 The Globalisation Backlash: Anti-globalisation, Nationalism, and Populism|106
4|6.4.4 A Rules-Based System Replaced by Deals-Based Agreements|108
3|6.5 Threats to Financial Stability and Financial Stability Regulatory Frameworks|109
4|6.5.1 Disruptions in the International Trade System|109
4|6.5.2 Nationalism Leading to a Disregard for International Interests in Financial Matters Especially Policy Normalisation|110
4|6.5.3 Dismantling of or Withdrawal from Existing Rules-Based Systems for Nationalist/Protectionist Purposes|111
4|6.5.4 Nationalism Leading to a Disregard for International Interest in Global Issues with Possible Financial Consequences, e.g. Climate Change and Technology|112
4|6.5.5 Protectionism Manifesting as a Disregard for Soft Law Instruments and Agreement|113
3|6.6 Conclusion|114
3|References|115
1|Part II: Practice|119
2|Chapter 7: The Comparative Dimension Regarding Approaches to Decision-Making in International Tax Arbitration|120
3|7.1 Introduction|120
3|7.2 Resolving International Tax Disputes: The Evolution of Mechanisms to Overcome Controversies, with particular reference to Arbitration|122
4|7.2.1 The 1963 OECD Model Tax Convention|122
4|7.2.2 The 1990 European Community Arbitration Convention|124
4|7.2.3 The 2008 Revised OECD Model Tax Convention|125
4|7.2.4 The 2011 Revised UN Model Tax Convention|126
4|7.2.5 The 2016 Revised United States Model Income Tax Convention|126
4|7.2.6 The 2017 Council Directive on Tax Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in the European Union|127
4|7.2.7 The 2018 Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting|128
3|7.3 Approaches to Decision-Making in International Tax Arbitration|130
4|7.3.1 The Form of Process for the Arbitration Process: A Practical Issue|130
4|7.3.2 Comparing the Arbitral Decision-Making Processes: The Advantages and Disadvantages|132
3|7.4 Conclusion: Which Is the Optimal Decision-Making Process in the International Tax Context?|137
3|References|138
2|Chapter 8: Conflicting Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration? Choice of Law for Arbitration Agreement in Absence of Parties’ Choice|141
3|8.1 Introduction|142
3|8.2 Sources of Questions and Solutions|143
4|8.2.1 New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law|143
4|8.2.2 National Court Decisions|144
3|8.3 Law Governing the Contract vs Law of the Seat|147
4|8.3.1 Separability Principle|148
4|8.3.2 Validation Principle|149
3|8.4 Parties’ Intention and Proper Law: Three-Stage Test vs Two-Stage Test|150
3|8.5 Recommended Approach: Law of the Seat as the Presumed/Imputed Choice?|152
4|8.5.1 Why Law of the Seat?|153
4|8.5.2 Application to Different Scenarios|155
3|8.6 Conclusion|157
3|References|158
2|Chapter 9: From Transplantation to Anticipation: Challenges for Environmental Law in a No-Analogue Future|159
3|9.1 Introduction|159
3|9.2 Globalisation and Legal Transplantation in Environmental Law|160
3|9.3 What to Expect When the Past Is No Guide|163
3|9.4 Features of Anticipatory Environmental Law|165
4|9.4.1 From Environmental Protection to Socio-Ecological Resilience|166
4|9.4.2 Allowing for Change Should Drive Higher Protections|169
4|9.4.3 Higher Environmental Protections Will Have Implications for Private Property Rights|170
4|9.4.4 Anticipatory Environmental Law Will Interact with Different Fields of Law|170
3|9.5 Conclusion|171
3|References|172
2|Chapter 10: Rule of Law as Comparative Law: Indonesia Revisits Code Reform|175
3|10.1 Introduction|176
3|10.2 The ‘Problem’ of Indonesian Civil Law|178
4|10.2.1 Code as Nation|179
4|10.2.2 Grappling with the Colonial Legacy|181
4|10.2.3 Effect on Pathways for Reform: De-Codification|184
4|10.2.4 Donors Dodging Code Reform|185
5|10.2.4.1 System Collision During Legal Transitions|186
5|10.2.4.2 Procedural Access and Enforcement in Indonesia|187
3|10.3 Competition Law Reform in Indonesia Re-visited|187
4|10.3.1 The Indonesian Competition Commission (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha)|188
5|10.3.1.1 Towards a more Effective Indonesian Competition Law|189
4|10.3.2 Re-igniting Interest in the Quality of Codes|190
5|10.3.2.1 Enter Japan|191
3|10.4 Conclusion|194
3|References|195
1|Part III: Education|198
2|Chapter 11: Comparative Law in Chinese Legal Education|199
3|11.1 Introduction|199
3|11.2 Legal Education in China|200
3|11.3 Comparative Law in China|204
4|11.3.1 Comparative Law Curriculum|206
4|11.3.2 Comparative Law Research|211
4|11.3.3 Summary|213
3|11.4 Conclusions|214
3|References|215
2|Chapter 12: Conclusion: The Relevance of Comparative Law|218
3|References|223
2|Mary Hiscock|5
2|Reference|7
1|Contents|8
1|Contributors|10
1|Chapter 1: Introduction: Comparative Dimensions of Law in Context|11
2|1.1 About Emeritus Professor Mary Hiscock|11
2|1.2 About the Book|14
2|References|14
1|Part I: Scholarship|15
2|Chapter 2: Recent Developments in Australian PPSA Case Law and Their Relevance to Other PPSA Jurisdictions|16
3|2.1 Introduction|17
3|2.2 Hamersley Iron|18
4|2.2.1 Case Overview|18
4|2.2.2 PPSA, section 338|21
4|2.2.3 PPSA, section 80(1) and Corporations Act, section 553C|23
4|2.2.4 Floating Charges and the PPSA|27
3|2.3 OneSteel|29
3|2.4 Samwise|33
4|2.4.1 Introduction|33
4|2.4.2 Case Overview|34
4|2.4.3 Analysis|36
4|2.4.4 The MacPhee Case|38
4|2.4.5 The CCPPSL Report|39
4|2.4.6 Advance Registration|40
4|2.4.7 Conclusion|41
3|2.5 Re Amerind|42
3|2.6 Conclusion|45
3|References|46
2|Chapter 3: A Return to That Other Country: Legal History as Comparative Law|48
3|3.1 Introduction|48
3|3.2 What Is Legal History?|49
3|3.3 What Is Comparative Law?|51
3|3.4 What Are the Techniques of Legal Historians?|52
3|3.5 What Are the Techniques of Comparative Lawyers?|54
3|3.6 What Are the Aims of Legal Historian and Comparatists?|56
3|3.7 Comparative Law and Legal History|56
3|3.8 Does It Matter?|59
3|3.9 A Salutary Tale|60
3|3.10 Conclusions|61
3|3.11 Envoi|61
3|References|62
2|Chapter 4: The Value of Comparative Law Approach in Treaty Interpretation|63
3|4.1 Introduction|64
3|4.2 The Situations under Which International Treaties Are Brought into the Context of Comparative Law Approach|65
4|4.2.1 International Treaties as a ‘Compared Norm’|65
4|4.2.2 Comparative Approach to Help Treaty Interpretation|66
3|4.3 Comparative Approach to Help Interpret Treaties Governing Private Relations|66
3|4.4 Comparative Approach to Help Interpret Treaties Governing States’ Relations or Behaviours|68
3|4.5 Comparative Approach to Help Identify the ‘Ordinary Meaning’ of a Treaty Term|68
4|4.5.1 Identifying the ‘Ordinary Meaning’ of a Treaty Term|68
4|4.5.2 Justification of Comparing Different Treaties to Help Identify the Ordinary Meaning of a Treaty Term|69
4|4.5.3 The Requirements for Applying the Comparative Approach to Help Identify the ‘Ordinary Meaning’|70
3|4.6 Comparative Law Approach Serving as a Supplementary Means of Treaty Interpretation|71
4|4.6.1 The Meaning and Scope of Supplementary Means of Treaty Interpretation|71
4|4.6.2 Other International Treaties as Part of Preparatory Work or the Circumstances of the Conclusion of an Interpreted Treaty|72
4|4.6.3 Separate Treaties as a Supplementary Means Other Than a Preparatory Work or the Circumstances of the Conclusion of an Interpreted Treaty|73
3|4.7 Some Concluding Remarks|74
3|References|74
2|Chapter 5: An Idea for a Better World: Human Rightsponsibility|76
3|5.1 Introduction|77
3|5.2 International Legal Order|78
3|5.3 Human Rights Movement|79
3|5.4 Human Rightsponsibility in Theory|81
3|5.5 Human Rightsponsibility in Action|85
3|5.6 Conclusion|86
3|References|87
2|Chapter 6: Financial Stability After the Global Financial Crisis: Globalisation, Nationalism and the Potential Demise of a Rules-Based Order|88
3|6.1 Introduction|88
3|6.2 Financial Stability – A Significant But Elusive Concept|90
4|6.2.1 ‘Finance’ and ‘Stability’|91
5|6.2.1.1 Finance Needs a Measure of Instability|91
5|6.2.1.2 Defining Stability by Its Opposite, Instability|92
5|6.2.1.3 Financial Stability and Equilibrium|93
5|6.2.1.4 Narrow and Broad Interpretations of ‘Financial Stability’|93
4|6.2.2 Regulating Financial Stability|94
3|6.3 Globalisation – A Paradigm|95
4|6.3.1 Globalisation Defined|95
4|6.3.2 Effects/Consequences of Globalisation|96
3|6.4 Globalisation and Financial Stability|97
4|6.4.1 Globalisation and Financial Markets|97
4|6.4.2 Globalisation’s Benefits for Financial Stability|98
4|6.4.3 Globalisation Undermining Financial Stability: Solutions to Financial Instability Become Causes of Financial Instability|100
5|6.4.3.1 The Unwinding of the Washington Consensus and a Globalisation Backlash|100
6|Bretton Woods|101
6|The Washington Consensus|102
5|6.4.3.2 The GFC and Its Aftermath|103
5|6.4.3.3 The Globalisation Backlash: Anti-globalisation, Nationalism, and Populism|106
4|6.4.4 A Rules-Based System Replaced by Deals-Based Agreements|108
3|6.5 Threats to Financial Stability and Financial Stability Regulatory Frameworks|109
4|6.5.1 Disruptions in the International Trade System|109
4|6.5.2 Nationalism Leading to a Disregard for International Interests in Financial Matters Especially Policy Normalisation|110
4|6.5.3 Dismantling of or Withdrawal from Existing Rules-Based Systems for Nationalist/Protectionist Purposes|111
4|6.5.4 Nationalism Leading to a Disregard for International Interest in Global Issues with Possible Financial Consequences, e.g. Climate Change and Technology|112
4|6.5.5 Protectionism Manifesting as a Disregard for Soft Law Instruments and Agreement|113
3|6.6 Conclusion|114
3|References|115
1|Part II: Practice|119
2|Chapter 7: The Comparative Dimension Regarding Approaches to Decision-Making in International Tax Arbitration|120
3|7.1 Introduction|120
3|7.2 Resolving International Tax Disputes: The Evolution of Mechanisms to Overcome Controversies, with particular reference to Arbitration|122
4|7.2.1 The 1963 OECD Model Tax Convention|122
4|7.2.2 The 1990 European Community Arbitration Convention|124
4|7.2.3 The 2008 Revised OECD Model Tax Convention|125
4|7.2.4 The 2011 Revised UN Model Tax Convention|126
4|7.2.5 The 2016 Revised United States Model Income Tax Convention|126
4|7.2.6 The 2017 Council Directive on Tax Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in the European Union|127
4|7.2.7 The 2018 Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting|128
3|7.3 Approaches to Decision-Making in International Tax Arbitration|130
4|7.3.1 The Form of Process for the Arbitration Process: A Practical Issue|130
4|7.3.2 Comparing the Arbitral Decision-Making Processes: The Advantages and Disadvantages|132
3|7.4 Conclusion: Which Is the Optimal Decision-Making Process in the International Tax Context?|137
3|References|138
2|Chapter 8: Conflicting Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration? Choice of Law for Arbitration Agreement in Absence of Parties’ Choice|141
3|8.1 Introduction|142
3|8.2 Sources of Questions and Solutions|143
4|8.2.1 New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law|143
4|8.2.2 National Court Decisions|144
3|8.3 Law Governing the Contract vs Law of the Seat|147
4|8.3.1 Separability Principle|148
4|8.3.2 Validation Principle|149
3|8.4 Parties’ Intention and Proper Law: Three-Stage Test vs Two-Stage Test|150
3|8.5 Recommended Approach: Law of the Seat as the Presumed/Imputed Choice?|152
4|8.5.1 Why Law of the Seat?|153
4|8.5.2 Application to Different Scenarios|155
3|8.6 Conclusion|157
3|References|158
2|Chapter 9: From Transplantation to Anticipation: Challenges for Environmental Law in a No-Analogue Future|159
3|9.1 Introduction|159
3|9.2 Globalisation and Legal Transplantation in Environmental Law|160
3|9.3 What to Expect When the Past Is No Guide|163
3|9.4 Features of Anticipatory Environmental Law|165
4|9.4.1 From Environmental Protection to Socio-Ecological Resilience|166
4|9.4.2 Allowing for Change Should Drive Higher Protections|169
4|9.4.3 Higher Environmental Protections Will Have Implications for Private Property Rights|170
4|9.4.4 Anticipatory Environmental Law Will Interact with Different Fields of Law|170
3|9.5 Conclusion|171
3|References|172
2|Chapter 10: Rule of Law as Comparative Law: Indonesia Revisits Code Reform|175
3|10.1 Introduction|176
3|10.2 The ‘Problem’ of Indonesian Civil Law|178
4|10.2.1 Code as Nation|179
4|10.2.2 Grappling with the Colonial Legacy|181
4|10.2.3 Effect on Pathways for Reform: De-Codification|184
4|10.2.4 Donors Dodging Code Reform|185
5|10.2.4.1 System Collision During Legal Transitions|186
5|10.2.4.2 Procedural Access and Enforcement in Indonesia|187
3|10.3 Competition Law Reform in Indonesia Re-visited|187
4|10.3.1 The Indonesian Competition Commission (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha)|188
5|10.3.1.1 Towards a more Effective Indonesian Competition Law|189
4|10.3.2 Re-igniting Interest in the Quality of Codes|190
5|10.3.2.1 Enter Japan|191
3|10.4 Conclusion|194
3|References|195
1|Part III: Education|198
2|Chapter 11: Comparative Law in Chinese Legal Education|199
3|11.1 Introduction|199
3|11.2 Legal Education in China|200
3|11.3 Comparative Law in China|204
4|11.3.1 Comparative Law Curriculum|206
4|11.3.2 Comparative Law Research|211
4|11.3.3 Summary|213
3|11.4 Conclusions|214
3|References|215
2|Chapter 12: Conclusion: The Relevance of Comparative Law|218
3|References|223