File #2761: "2019_Book_TheCourtOfArbitrationForSportA.pdf"
Testo
1|Preface|7
1|Contents|9
1|Abbreviations|12
1|Introduction|14
1|1 Cour Suprême du Sport Mondial|15
2|Abstract|15
2|1.1 The First Thirty Years|15
2|1.2 Studying the Judge: CAS as an Arbitration Court|17
2|1.3 Studying a Legal Bumblebee: CAS and the Development of a Transnational Legal Order|19
2|1.4 Descriptive and Critical, Doctrinal and Empirical|26
2|1.5 Data Collection, Confidentiality, and Public Access|28
2|1.6 Law as Network|33
2|1.7 Organization of the Book|38
2|References|39
1|2 CAS: An Overview|43
2|Abstract|43
2|2.1 Organizational and Regulatory Framework|43
2|2.2 Jurisdiction|47
2|2.3 Formation|50
2|2.4 Sports and Subject Matters|51
2|References|53
1|The Jurisprudence|55
1|3 The Lay of the Land: The Topography of CAS Jurisprudence|56
2|Abstract|56
2|3.1 Treasure Islands(?)|56
2|3.2 Let’s Stay Connected|63
2|3.3 Requests In, Decisions Out|72
2|3.4 Requests In, and Then What?|77
2|3.5 References Out|82
2|3.6 References In|89
2|References|92
1|4 CAS Decisions as Precedent|95
2|Abstract|95
2|4.1 Precedent and Non-arbitrary Arbitration|95
2|4.2 Horizontal Precedent|101
3|4.2.1 What CAS Says: CAS on CAS Decisions as Precedent|101
3|4.2.2 What CAS Does: Habit of Adherence|104
3|4.2.3 De Facto Stare Decisis|110
2|4.3 Vertical Precedent|112
2|4.4 Looking Forward and Setting the Right Precedent|116
2|4.5 Unpublished Decisions as Precedent|118
2|4.6 System-Arbitrator-Precedent|123
2|References|125
1|5 CAS’s Landmark Decisions|128
2|Abstract|128
2|5.1 Importance of Important Decisions|128
2|5.2 Degree Distribution: A Few Good Cases|130
2|5.3 CAS’s High Impact Decisions|134
2|5.4 Good or Just Old? The Example of Strict Liability and Proportional Sanctions|141
2|5.5 Strategically Placed Decisions|147
2|5.6 Characteristics of Landmark Decisions|150
2|References|152
1|6 Structure of CAS’s Jurisprudence|154
2|Abstract|154
2|6.1 The Importance of Structure|154
2|6.2 Communities|155
3|6.2.1 Three Approaches to Community Detection|155
3|6.2.2 LDA Topic Modelling|157
3|6.2.3 Understanding Topics|158
3|6.2.4 Co-citation Clustering|168
3|6.2.5 Subjects, Topics, and Clusters Compared|172
2|6.3 Connections|176
3|6.3.1 Precedential Power: Leader of the Pack?|176
3|6.3.2 Persuasive Power: With a Little Help from My Friends?|183
3|6.3.3 Inter-Community Influence: All by Myself?|188
2|6.4 What We Might Have Missed|191
2|References|191
1|7 CAS’s Normative Contribution|193
2|Abstract|193
2|7.1 Norms, Rules, and Principles, in and from CAS|193
2|7.2 Constitutional and Administrative Norms: Allocation and Exercise of Power|199
2|7.3 Respect for Fundamental Rights|207
2|7.4 Procedural Norms: CAS on Being Before CAS|212
2|7.5 Methodological Norms: Norms for Determining Norms|214
2|7.6 Sanctions and Remedies|217
2|7.7 Method, Madness, and Magpies|220
2|References|223
1|The Actors|225
1|8 CAS Arbitrators and Their Relationships|226
2|Abstract|226
2|8.1 CAS as a Human Network|226
2|8.2 The Appointable Arbitrator|227
2|8.3 The Appointed Arbitrator|229
2|8.4 The Co-appearing Arbitrator|235
2|8.5 The Football Arbitrator|239
2|8.6 The Influential Arbitrator|242
2|8.7 The Repeat Arbitrator|247
2|8.8 The Compatriot Arbitrator|258
2|8.9 The President Arbitrator|261
2|8.10 The Sole Arbitrator|265
2|References|266
1|9 The Characteristics of CAS Arbitrators|268
2|Abstract|268
2|9.1 Who the Arbitrators Are and Why It Matters|268
2|9.2 Demographics of CAS Arbitrators|271
3|9.2.1 Age|271
3|9.2.2 Gender|274
3|9.2.3 Professional Background|276
3|9.2.4 Geographic Origin|277
3|9.2.5 Towards Increased Diversity and Representativeness|281
2|9.3 The Role of Legal Tradition|282
2|9.4 The Role of Language|288
2|References|291
1|10 CAS from the Litigants’ Perspective|293
2|Abstract|293
2|10.1 Forms of Arbitration|293
2|10.2 Individuals as CAS Litigants|298
2|10.3 Clubs as CAS Litigants|303
2|10.4 Sports Governing Bodies as CAS Litigants|305
2|10.5 Geographic Origin of CAS Litigants|309
2|10.6 The Roles of CAS|316
2|References|318
1|Table of Cases|319
1|Table of Sources|334
1|Index|350
1|Contents|9
1|Abbreviations|12
1|Introduction|14
1|1 Cour Suprême du Sport Mondial|15
2|Abstract|15
2|1.1 The First Thirty Years|15
2|1.2 Studying the Judge: CAS as an Arbitration Court|17
2|1.3 Studying a Legal Bumblebee: CAS and the Development of a Transnational Legal Order|19
2|1.4 Descriptive and Critical, Doctrinal and Empirical|26
2|1.5 Data Collection, Confidentiality, and Public Access|28
2|1.6 Law as Network|33
2|1.7 Organization of the Book|38
2|References|39
1|2 CAS: An Overview|43
2|Abstract|43
2|2.1 Organizational and Regulatory Framework|43
2|2.2 Jurisdiction|47
2|2.3 Formation|50
2|2.4 Sports and Subject Matters|51
2|References|53
1|The Jurisprudence|55
1|3 The Lay of the Land: The Topography of CAS Jurisprudence|56
2|Abstract|56
2|3.1 Treasure Islands(?)|56
2|3.2 Let’s Stay Connected|63
2|3.3 Requests In, Decisions Out|72
2|3.4 Requests In, and Then What?|77
2|3.5 References Out|82
2|3.6 References In|89
2|References|92
1|4 CAS Decisions as Precedent|95
2|Abstract|95
2|4.1 Precedent and Non-arbitrary Arbitration|95
2|4.2 Horizontal Precedent|101
3|4.2.1 What CAS Says: CAS on CAS Decisions as Precedent|101
3|4.2.2 What CAS Does: Habit of Adherence|104
3|4.2.3 De Facto Stare Decisis|110
2|4.3 Vertical Precedent|112
2|4.4 Looking Forward and Setting the Right Precedent|116
2|4.5 Unpublished Decisions as Precedent|118
2|4.6 System-Arbitrator-Precedent|123
2|References|125
1|5 CAS’s Landmark Decisions|128
2|Abstract|128
2|5.1 Importance of Important Decisions|128
2|5.2 Degree Distribution: A Few Good Cases|130
2|5.3 CAS’s High Impact Decisions|134
2|5.4 Good or Just Old? The Example of Strict Liability and Proportional Sanctions|141
2|5.5 Strategically Placed Decisions|147
2|5.6 Characteristics of Landmark Decisions|150
2|References|152
1|6 Structure of CAS’s Jurisprudence|154
2|Abstract|154
2|6.1 The Importance of Structure|154
2|6.2 Communities|155
3|6.2.1 Three Approaches to Community Detection|155
3|6.2.2 LDA Topic Modelling|157
3|6.2.3 Understanding Topics|158
3|6.2.4 Co-citation Clustering|168
3|6.2.5 Subjects, Topics, and Clusters Compared|172
2|6.3 Connections|176
3|6.3.1 Precedential Power: Leader of the Pack?|176
3|6.3.2 Persuasive Power: With a Little Help from My Friends?|183
3|6.3.3 Inter-Community Influence: All by Myself?|188
2|6.4 What We Might Have Missed|191
2|References|191
1|7 CAS’s Normative Contribution|193
2|Abstract|193
2|7.1 Norms, Rules, and Principles, in and from CAS|193
2|7.2 Constitutional and Administrative Norms: Allocation and Exercise of Power|199
2|7.3 Respect for Fundamental Rights|207
2|7.4 Procedural Norms: CAS on Being Before CAS|212
2|7.5 Methodological Norms: Norms for Determining Norms|214
2|7.6 Sanctions and Remedies|217
2|7.7 Method, Madness, and Magpies|220
2|References|223
1|The Actors|225
1|8 CAS Arbitrators and Their Relationships|226
2|Abstract|226
2|8.1 CAS as a Human Network|226
2|8.2 The Appointable Arbitrator|227
2|8.3 The Appointed Arbitrator|229
2|8.4 The Co-appearing Arbitrator|235
2|8.5 The Football Arbitrator|239
2|8.6 The Influential Arbitrator|242
2|8.7 The Repeat Arbitrator|247
2|8.8 The Compatriot Arbitrator|258
2|8.9 The President Arbitrator|261
2|8.10 The Sole Arbitrator|265
2|References|266
1|9 The Characteristics of CAS Arbitrators|268
2|Abstract|268
2|9.1 Who the Arbitrators Are and Why It Matters|268
2|9.2 Demographics of CAS Arbitrators|271
3|9.2.1 Age|271
3|9.2.2 Gender|274
3|9.2.3 Professional Background|276
3|9.2.4 Geographic Origin|277
3|9.2.5 Towards Increased Diversity and Representativeness|281
2|9.3 The Role of Legal Tradition|282
2|9.4 The Role of Language|288
2|References|291
1|10 CAS from the Litigants’ Perspective|293
2|Abstract|293
2|10.1 Forms of Arbitration|293
2|10.2 Individuals as CAS Litigants|298
2|10.3 Clubs as CAS Litigants|303
2|10.4 Sports Governing Bodies as CAS Litigants|305
2|10.5 Geographic Origin of CAS Litigants|309
2|10.6 The Roles of CAS|316
2|References|318
1|Table of Cases|319
1|Table of Sources|334
1|Index|350